Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
595
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT Samsung's Reply Claim Construction Brief filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Briggs Declaration in Support of Samsung's Reply Claim Construction Brief, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/9/2012)
EXHIBIT C
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN JOSE DIVISION
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
---------------------------------x
APPLE INC., a California
)
corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)No. 11-CV-01846LHK
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
)
a Korean entity; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a
)
New York corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability
)
Company,
)
)
Defendants. )
---------------------------------x
14
15
16
17
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF TONY GIVARGIS, PH.D.
18
Los Angeles, California
19
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
20
21
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
22
23
Reported by:
24
SUSAN A. SULLIVAN, CSR #3522, RPR, CRR
25
JOB NO. 44330
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 5
1
2
3
MR. SHAH:
and representing Apple.
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
4
5
Ali Shah, WilmerHale, for the witness
Thank you.
And will the reporter now swear or affirm
the witness.
6
7
TONY GIVARGIS, PH.D.,
8
called as a witness, having been duly sworn by
9
the court reporter, was examined and testified
10
as follows:
11
12
EXAMINATION
13
BY MS. MAROULIS:
14
Q
15
today?
16
A
Good, thank you.
17
Q
My name is Victoria Maroulis and I will be
18
Good morning, Mr. Givargis.
How are you
asking you some questions today.
19
Have you ever been deposed before?
20
A
No.
21
Q
In that case let me briefly run you through
22
23
the rules of the deposition.
First of all, do you understand that you
24
are testifying today like you would be in a court of
25
law under oath even though we're sitting in a
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 34
1
2
Q
system independent nature of applets?
3
4
Is there any references in this patent to
A
You mean operating-system dependent or just
system?
5
Q
Yes.
6
A
No, there is not.
7
Q
If you recall, is there any reference to
8
Java in the context of applets in the prosecution
9
history?
10
MR. SHAH:
If you need to review any documents,
11
you can ask for them.
12
THE WITNESS:
13
had a copy of the prosecution history.
14
15
Yes, I would appreciate it if I
MS. MAROULIS:
history.
16
I'm happy to mark the file
It is rather sizeable.
Let's mark this as Exhibit 5.
17
(Givargis Exhibit 5, a document, Bates Nos.
18
SAMNDCA00007840 to SAMNDCA00008459, marked
19
for identification, as of this date.)
20
Q
BY MS. MAROULIS:
Sir, I'm placing before
21
you Exhibit 5.
22
prosecution history of the '711 patent?
23
24
25
Do you recognize it as the
A
I believe portions of it I have reviewed,
Q
You don't remember reviewing the whole
yes.
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 35
1
thing?
2
A
Not the entire thing, no.
3
Q
How did you decide what portions of that
4
file history to review?
5
A
6
attorneys.
7
Q
The file history was provided to me by the
The file history that you see before you is
8
double-sided, so do you remember giving me documents
9
that is this thick or thicker or was it a smaller
10
document?
11
A
I recall a smaller document.
12
MS. MAROULIS:
Counsel, I would appreciate
13
seeing the version of the file history that was
14
provided to the witness.
15
MR. SHAH:
I can represent that we provided the
16
certified file history.
17
MS. MAROULIS:
18
MR. SHAH:
19
MS. MAROULIS.
20
Q
The entire file history?
We did.
Via PDF file, not via paper.
BY MS. MAROULIS:
This is not a memory
21
test, but do you recall any references to Java in
22
the context of applets in the file history?
23
24
25
A
There was absolutely no reference to Java
in the file history that I reviewed.
Q
Was there any reference to applet being
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 36
1
2
operating-systems independent?
A
I do not recall any reference to operating-
3
system-independent applets in the file history that
4
I reviewed.
5
Q
Turning back to Exhibit 2 which is the
6
patent-in-suit, is it correct, sir, that there's
7
only one place where applets are mentioned in the
8
patent?
9
10
A
There is only one place in the
specification that refers to patents.
11
Q
Thank you.
12
A
And to applet.
13
Q
Thank you for correcting me.
14
specification.
15
16
I did mean
And is it correct, sir, that that place in
the specification is Column 3, Lines 8 through 14?
17
A
Yes, that is correct.
18
Q
This passage does not mention Java as well,
19
correct?
20
A
That is correct.
21
Q
And it does not mention operating-systems
22
independent.
23
A
That is correct, yes.
24
Q
Why do you cite this passage to support
25
your definition in your declaration?
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
Page 37
1
A
Yes.
The important element of this passage
2
is the part that says at least one applet within an
3
application model -- module or in each of the
4
application modules, and that relationship of an
5
applet within an application module or in the
6
context of an application module is relevant to my
7
understanding and definition of applets being
8
interpreted by a host application module.
9
Q
Where do you see the word "within," sir?
10
A
There is no "within" in this, in this
11
particular text.
12
Q
Okay.
13
A
There's an association, yes.
14
Q
Can you explain how you read this last
15
16
sentence to support your definition.
A
"Application modules of the portable
17
terminal include at least one applet and each of the
18
application modules, that is each menu of the
19
portable terminal, independently performs multi-
20
tasking."
21
So as I interpret it, the applets run
22
within or execute within an application module or
23
execute in the context of an application module.
24
25
Q
Do you draw a distinction between
"application module" and "program"?
TSG Reporting 877-702-9580
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?