Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 614

Declaration of Harold J. McElhinny in Support of Apple's Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Things filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit A 425 MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94105-2482 TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000 FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522 MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO , L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O , SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O , D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A, WASH I N G T O N , D .C. T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S, BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G WWW.MOFO.COM January 4, 2012 Writer’s Direct Contact 415.268.6024 MMazza@mofo.com Via E-Mail (diane hutnyan@quinnemanuel.com) Diane Hutnyan Quinn Emanuel 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Re: Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.) Dear Diane: This letter provides Apple’s agenda for the January 5, 2012, lead trial counsel meeting. In attendance will be Harold McElhinny, Richard Hung, Samuel Maselli, and myself. We suggest that the parties alternate discussion of their respective issues, so that we address one item on Apple’s agenda, then one item on Samsung’s agenda, and so forth. Sufficiency of Samsung’s search for relevant documents from inventors; Production of Samsung sales-related and other financial documents; Sufficiency of expedited production of source code and related technical documents under the December 22, 2011 Order; Expanded production of Samsung technical documents Production of Samsung design-around documents, including but not limited to documents regarding blue-glow functionality; Production of Samsung documents related to Apple’s trademark and trade dress claims; Production of Samsung marketing- and advertising-related documents; Sufficiency of Samsung’s expedited production of design history documents under the December 22, 2011, Order; Expanded production of Samsung design history documents; Protective Order Regarding Disclosure and Use of Discovery Materials; sf-3090216 Diane Hutnyan January 4, 2012 Page Two Completeness of Samsung’s December 31, 2011 production of surveys and designer emails; Samsung’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice; Production of Samsung documents related to specific surveys called out in Apple correspondence; Production of Samsung documents related to Samsung’s participation in standardssetting organizations; Production of Samsung documents relating to its licenses and license negotiations regarding patents declared standards essential; Samsung’s response to Apple Interrogatory Nos. 8 and 9 (Conception and Reduction to Practice of Samsung Patents-in-Suit); Expert issues related to Messrs. Bressler, Sowayan, and Lucente; and Scheduling of remaining depositions of Samsung witnesses in January and early February. Sincerely, /s/ Mia Mazza Mia Mazza cc: Samuel Maselli S. Calvin Walden Peter Kolovos sf-3090216

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?