Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 62

Proposed Order DENYING SAMSUNG'S MOTION TO COMPEL EXPEDITED DISCOVERY by Apple Inc.. (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 6/7/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18
19

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company.,,

Case No.

4:11-cv-01846-LHK

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL
EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

June 17, 2011
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 4, 5th Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh

20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG'S MOTION TO COMPEL EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
Case No. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK

1

1

[PROPOSED ORDER]

2

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung

3

Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) have moved this Court for an order

4

to compel Apple Inc. (“Apple”) to produce to Samsung samples of products that have not been

5

announced or released for sale.

6
7

Having considered the briefing and other papers submitted by the parties, the Court
DENIES Samsung’s motion.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12
13

Dated: ___________________, 2011

By:
LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG'S MOTION TO COMPEL EXPEDITED DISCOVERY
Case No. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK

1