Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 622

Proposed Order re #621 Opposition/Response to Motion,, #532 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-3(b) by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Briggs, Todd) (Filed on 1/12/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE
EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS
REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE
4-3(b)

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

02198.51855/4548388.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS
REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-3(b)

1

Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) has filed Apple’s Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed

2 as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-3.
3

Having considered the briefing and other papers submitted by the parties, the court

4 DENIES Apple’s motion.
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

8
9 DATED:

______________________

10
11
12

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

02198.51855/4548388.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS
REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-3(b)