Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 622

Proposed Order re 621 Opposition/Response to Motion,, 532 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-3(b) by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Briggs, Todd) (Filed on 1/12/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-3(b) Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4548388.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-3(b) 1 Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) has filed Apple’s Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed 2 as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-3. 3 Having considered the briefing and other papers submitted by the parties, the court 4 DENIES Apple’s motion. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 DATED: ______________________ 10 11 12 HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4548388.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-3(b)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?