Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
622
Proposed Order re #621 Opposition/Response to Motion,, #532 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-3(b) by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Briggs, Todd) (Filed on 1/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE
EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS
REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE
4-3(b)
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4548388.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS
REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-3(b)
1
Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) has filed Apple’s Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed
2 as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-3.
3
Having considered the briefing and other papers submitted by the parties, the court
4 DENIES Apple’s motion.
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9 DATED:
______________________
10
11
12
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4548388.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE EVIDENCE NOT DISCLOSED AS
REQUIRED BY PATENT LOCAL RULE 4-3(b)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?