Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 632

OPPOSITION to ( 602 Samsung's MOTION for a Protective Order Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ( re Samsung's January 10, 2012 Filings ) filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Mazza Declaration, # 2 Bartlett Declaration, # 3 Ex. A to Bartlett Declaration, # 4 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 1/17/2012) Modified text on 1/18/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 19 v. Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3094708 1 Defendant Samsung seeks entry of a proposed Protective Order Regarding Disclosure and 2 Use of Discovery Materials. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers 3 submitted, Samsung’s Motion for a Protective Order is DENIED. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: January _____, 2012. 6 7 8 HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3094708 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?