Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 636

DECLARATION in Opposition to #602 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's January 10, 2012 Filings Bartlett and Mazza Declarations in Support of Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Compel filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Bartlett Declaration, #2 Exhibit 2 to Bartlett Declaration, #3 Exhibit 3 to Bartlett Declaration, #4 Exhibit 4 to Bartlett Declaration, #5 Exhibit 5 to Bartlett Declaration, #6 Exhibit 6 to Bartlett Declaration, #7 Exhibit 7 to Bartlett Declaration, #8 Exhibit 8 to Bartlett Declaration, #9 Mazza Declaration, #10 Exhibit A to Mazza Declaration, #11 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #602 ) (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit A From: Rachel Herrick Kassabian [] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 6:58 PM To: Mazza, Mia; Bartlett, Jason R. Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Samsung ITC Subject: Samsung Deposition Dates Mia and Jason,     Pursuant to the parties’ agreement to exchange all deposition dates today, below please find proposed  deposition dates for the following witnesses:     Witness  Location  Date (NDCA)  Date (796 ITC)    Seoul  Feb. 2       Seoul  Feb. 2  Feb. 3    San Francisco  Feb. 3       Seoul  Feb. 7       Seoul  Feb. 7       Seoul  Feb. 9  Feb. 10    Seoul  Feb. 10       Seoul  Feb. 10       Seoul  Feb. 16  Feb. 17  g  Seoul  Feb. 17          Seoul  Feb. 17    Seoul  Feb. 2  Feb. 3    Seoul  Feb. 20       Seoul  Feb. 22       Seoul  Feb. 22       Texas  Feb. 24       Seoul  Feb. 27       Seoul  Feb. 29    Seoul  Feb. 29    Seoul  Mar. 2       Seoul  Mar. 5       Seoul  Mar. 7    Seoul  Mar. 7    Seoul  Mar. 8        Italicized dates/ names are still awaiting final confirmation and may be subject to change.     Please note that just because a date is offered above, it does not mean that Samsung has waived its  objections to producing these witnesses.  To the contrary, Samsung reserves all rights to object to  producing these witnesses, including on relevance, cumulativeness or apex grounds, among others.  We  will notify Apple regarding any witnesses Samsung declines to produce in due course.     Further, we have just received a few additional deposition notices yesterday, which arrived after we  agreed to exchange deposition dates today.  We have not yet had a chance to consult with our client on  these and will get back to you next week.  If you believe our list is missing any other deponents, please advise.     Finally, please note that Samsung will not be providing a deposition date for  , as Samsung has already  made a final determination that his deposition is an improper apex deposition, per our correspondence earlier  today.     Please send proposed deposition dates for all noticed Apple witnesses, per the parties agreement, today.     Regards,     Rachel Herrick Kassabian | Partner   Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor  Redwood Shores, CA 94065  650.801.5005 Direct 650.801.5000 Main 650.801.5100 Fax  NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.        

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?