Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 636

DECLARATION in Opposition to #602 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's January 10, 2012 Filings Bartlett and Mazza Declarations in Support of Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Compel filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Bartlett Declaration, #2 Exhibit 2 to Bartlett Declaration, #3 Exhibit 3 to Bartlett Declaration, #4 Exhibit 4 to Bartlett Declaration, #5 Exhibit 5 to Bartlett Declaration, #6 Exhibit 6 to Bartlett Declaration, #7 Exhibit 7 to Bartlett Declaration, #8 Exhibit 8 to Bartlett Declaration, #9 Mazza Declaration, #10 Exhibit A to Mazza Declaration, #11 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #602 ) (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Exhibit A

From:

Rachel Herrick Kassabian [[e-mail]]

Sent:

Friday, January 13, 2012 6:58 PM

To:

Mazza, Mia; Bartlett, Jason R.

Cc:

AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; Samsung ITC

Subject: Samsung Deposition Dates

Mia and Jason, 

Pursuant to the parties’ agreement to exchange all deposition dates today, below please find proposed 
deposition dates for the following witnesses: 

Witness 
Location 
Date (NDCA) 
Date (796 ITC) 

Seoul 
Feb. 2 

Seoul 
Feb. 2 
Feb. 3 

San Francisco 
Feb. 3 

Seoul 
Feb. 7 

Seoul 
Feb. 7 

Seoul 
Feb. 9 
Feb. 10 

Seoul 
Feb. 10 

Seoul 
Feb. 10 

Seoul 
Feb. 16 
Feb. 17 
g 
Seoul 
Feb. 17 

Seoul 
Feb. 17 

Seoul 
Feb. 2 
Feb. 3 

Seoul 
Feb. 20 

Seoul 
Feb. 22 

Seoul 
Feb. 22 

Texas 
Feb. 24 

Seoul 
Feb. 27 

Seoul 
Feb. 29 

Seoul 
Feb. 29 

Seoul 
Mar. 2 

Seoul 
Mar. 5 

  Seoul 
Mar. 7 

Seoul 
Mar. 7 

Seoul 
Mar. 8 

Italicized dates/ names are still awaiting final confirmation and may be subject to change. 

Please note that just because a date is offered above, it does not mean that Samsung has waived its 
objections to producing these witnesses.  To the contrary, Samsung reserves all rights to object to 
producing these witnesses, including on relevance, cumulativeness or apex grounds, among others.  We 
will notify Apple regarding any witnesses Samsung declines to produce in due course. 

Further, we have just received a few additional deposition notices yesterday, which arrived after we 
agreed to exchange deposition dates today.  We have not yet had a chance to consult with our client on 

these and will get back to you next week.  If you believe our list is missing any other deponents, please advise. 

Finally, please note that Samsung will not be providing a deposition date for 
, as Samsung has already 
made a final determination that his deposition is an improper apex deposition, per our correspondence earlier 
today. 

Please send proposed deposition dates for all noticed Apple witnesses, per the parties agreement, today. 

Regards, 

Rachel Herrick Kassabian | Partner  
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor 
Redwood Shores, CA 94065 
650.801.5005 Direct
650.801.5000 Main
650.801.5100 Fax
[e-mail]
www.quinnemanuel.com 

NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This
message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in
error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.