Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
636
DECLARATION in Opposition to #602 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's January 10, 2012 Filings Bartlett and Mazza Declarations in Support of Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Compel filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Bartlett Declaration, #2 Exhibit 2 to Bartlett Declaration, #3 Exhibit 3 to Bartlett Declaration, #4 Exhibit 4 to Bartlett Declaration, #5 Exhibit 5 to Bartlett Declaration, #6 Exhibit 6 to Bartlett Declaration, #7 Exhibit 7 to Bartlett Declaration, #8 Exhibit 8 to Bartlett Declaration, #9 Mazza Declaration, #10 Exhibit A to Mazza Declaration, #11 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #602 ) (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
17
18
19
v.
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
COMPEL APPLE TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL APPLE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3094706
1
Defendant Samsung seeks an order compelling Apple to produce documents and things by
2
January 22, 2012. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted,
3
Samsung’s Motion to Compel Apple to Produce Documents and Things is DENIED.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: January _____, 2012.
6
7
8
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO COMPEL APPLE TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS AND THINGS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3094706
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?