Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
665
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting #659 Motion to Shorten Time (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME
Samsung has filed a motion seeking leave to supplement its infringement contentions and a
20
motion to shorten time for briefing and hearing on its motion to supplement its infringement
21
contentions. See ECF Nos. 658 & 659. Samsung’s motion to shorten time is GRANTED and the
22
following briefing schedule is adopted:
23
Apple may file a response, no longer than 10 pages, by January 30, 2012.
24
Samsung may file a reply, no longer than 3 pages, by February 2, 2012.
25
The Court will attempt to resolve the issue on the papers without a hearing. Moreover, the
26
parties are encouraged to continue to attempt to resolve this issue without court involvement and
27
submit a stipulation before briefing is closed on February 2, 2012.
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: January 26, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?