Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
668
MOTION to Shorten Time re #667 Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Briggs Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
13
14
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
Plaintiff,
vs.
15 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
16 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
17 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
Defendants.
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING
ON SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
SUPPLEMENT ITS INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS
20
21
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
22 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have moved pursuant to Civil
23 Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-3 for an order shortening the briefing and hearing schedule for
24 Samsung’s Motion to Supplement Its Invalidity Contentions.
25
Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and good cause
26 having been shown, the Court hereby grants Samsung's Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing and
27 Hearing, and sets the hearing at February 16, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff Apple Inc. may file and
28
02198.51855/4572231.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
-1-
1 serve its opposition papers no later than February 1, 2012.
Samsung may file and serve its reply
2 papers no later than February 6, 2012.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 DATED:
_________________, 2012
7
8
9
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4572231.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?