Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
671
EXHIBITS re #667 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions (Baxter Declaration in Support of Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions) filed bySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X)(Related document(s) #667 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/27/2012)
EXHIBIT G
425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA 94105-2482
U.S.A.
MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP
TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000
FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522
T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S,
BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G
N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO ,
L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O ,
SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O ,
D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A,
WASH I N G T O N , D .C.
WWW.MOFO.COM
December 22, 2011
Writer’s Direct Contact
415.268.6615
JasonBartlett@mofo.com
By Email (marissaducca@quinnemanuel.com)
Marissa Ducca
Quinn Emanuel
1299 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 825
Washington, D.C. 20004
Re:
Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Marissa:
Pursuant to your request and letter of December 21, 2011, Apple has produced for
Samsung’s inspection at Morrison & Foerster’s Palo Alto offices the additional Mac OS 10.0
source code classes identified in your letter. Please let us know when you would like to
review them. Note that our offices are not open over the Christmas weekend.
With respect to your new request that Apple load Mac OS 10.0 on a different computer, we
are actively seeking new hardware. We note that, contrary to the misrepresentations of your
letter, Samsung never requested that the Mac OS 10.0 be loaded on a laptop as opposed to a
desktop. Nor was the hardware that Apple provided for your inspection deficient. When you
state in your letter that a Samsung attorney was “force[d] to visit an electronics store to
purchase the proper equipment,” you are apparently referring to the fact that Samsung
decided to purchase and install in a simple USB cable — a cable that was not needed to use
the machine and which appeared to do nothing after it was installed.
Apple is attempting to locate an alternative computer and, assuming that it is able to do so,
expects to complete production of Mac OS 10.0 on that computer by January 6, 2011. In the
interim, if you have a proposed stipulation regarding the public release date of Mac OS 10.0,
as discussed during yesterday’s call, Apple will consider it. Please forward the proposal at
your earliest opportunity.
Sincerely,
/s/ Jason R. Bartlett
Jason R. Bartlett
sf-3087178
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?