Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 671

EXHIBITS re #667 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions (Baxter Declaration in Support of Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions) filed bySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X)(Related document(s) #667 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/27/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT G 425 MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94105-2482 U.S.A. MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000 FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522 T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S, BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO , L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O , SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O , D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A, WASH I N G T O N , D .C. WWW.MOFO.COM December 22, 2011 Writer’s Direct Contact 415.268.6615 JasonBartlett@mofo.com By Email (marissaducca@quinnemanuel.com) Marissa Ducca Quinn Emanuel 1299 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 825 Washington, D.C. 20004 Re: Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.) Dear Marissa: Pursuant to your request and letter of December 21, 2011, Apple has produced for Samsung’s inspection at Morrison & Foerster’s Palo Alto offices the additional Mac OS 10.0 source code classes identified in your letter. Please let us know when you would like to review them. Note that our offices are not open over the Christmas weekend. With respect to your new request that Apple load Mac OS 10.0 on a different computer, we are actively seeking new hardware. We note that, contrary to the misrepresentations of your letter, Samsung never requested that the Mac OS 10.0 be loaded on a laptop as opposed to a desktop. Nor was the hardware that Apple provided for your inspection deficient. When you state in your letter that a Samsung attorney was “force[d] to visit an electronics store to purchase the proper equipment,” you are apparently referring to the fact that Samsung decided to purchase and install in a simple USB cable — a cable that was not needed to use the machine and which appeared to do nothing after it was installed. Apple is attempting to locate an alternative computer and, assuming that it is able to do so, expects to complete production of Mac OS 10.0 on that computer by January 6, 2011. In the interim, if you have a proposed stipulation regarding the public release date of Mac OS 10.0, as discussed during yesterday’s call, Apple will consider it. Please forward the proposal at your earliest opportunity. Sincerely, /s/ Jason R. Bartlett Jason R. Bartlett sf-3087178

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?