Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
671
EXHIBITS re #667 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions (Baxter Declaration in Support of Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions) filed bySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X)(Related document(s) #667 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/27/2012)
EXHIBIT I
425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA 94105-2482
TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000
FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522
MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP
N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO ,
L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O ,
SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O ,
D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A,
WASH I N G T O N , D .C.
T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S,
BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G
WWW.MOFO.COM
January 8, 2012
Writer’s Direct Contact
415.268.6024
MMazza@mofo.com
Via E-Mail (toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com)
Todd Briggs
Quinn Emanuel
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Re:
Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.)
Dear Todd:
We write in response to your January 5, 2012, letter to Richard Hung requesting that Apple
stipulate to Samsung’s service of supplemental invalidity contentions.
We have conveyed your request to our client. If you could please provide the dates when
Samsung first learned of each alleged prior art reference listed in your letter, it will help
Apple determine whether it can agree to your request.
Sincerely,
/s/ Mia Mazza
Mia Mazza
cc:
Samuel Maselli
S. Calvin Walden
Peter Kolovos
sf-3091067
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?