Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 671

EXHIBITS re #667 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions (Baxter Declaration in Support of Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions) filed bySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X)(Related document(s) #667 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 1/27/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT I 425 MARKET STREET SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA 94105-2482 TELEPHONE: 415.268.7000 FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522 MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO , L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O , SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O , D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A, WASH I N G T O N , D .C. T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S, BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G WWW.MOFO.COM January 8, 2012 Writer’s Direct Contact 415.268.6024 MMazza@mofo.com Via E-Mail (toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com) Todd Briggs Quinn Emanuel 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Re: Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.) Dear Todd: We write in response to your January 5, 2012, letter to Richard Hung requesting that Apple stipulate to Samsung’s service of supplemental invalidity contentions. We have conveyed your request to our client. If you could please provide the dates when Samsung first learned of each alleged prior art reference listed in your letter, it will help Apple determine whether it can agree to your request. Sincerely, /s/ Mia Mazza Mia Mazza cc: Samuel Maselli S. Calvin Walden Peter Kolovos sf-3091067

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?