Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 678

RESPONSE (re #668 MOTION to Shorten Time re #667 Samsung's Motion to Supplement Invalidity Contentions ) Opposition to Samsung's Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing and Hearing filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hung, Richard) (Filed on 1/27/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING
AND HEARING ON SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT
INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOT. TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3099890

1

Samsung has filed a motion seeking leave to supplement its invalidity contentions and a

2

motion to shorten time for briefing and hearing on its motion to supplement its invalidity

3

contentions. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted,

4

Samsung’s Motion to Shorten Time is DENIED. The following briefing schedule is adopted:

5

Apple may file a response by February 9, 2012.

6

Samsung may not file a reply.

7

The Court will attempt to resolve the issues on the papers without a hearing.

8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January _____, 2012.

11
12
13

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOT. TO SHORTEN TIME
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3099890