Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 718

Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #707 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Unopposed Motion for Issuance of a Request for Judicial Assistance and related exhibits filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) #707 ) (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 10 11 12 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN JOSE DIVISION 17 18 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK sf-3104198 1 I, Cyndi Wheeler, do hereby declare as follows: 2 1. I am an attorney for Apple Inc. (“Apple”). I submit this declaration in support of 3 Samsung’s Motion to File Documents Under Seal filed on February 2, 2012. [Dkt. No. 707.] 4 Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below. If called as 5 a witness I could and would testify competently as follows. 6 2. Samsung’s Unopposed Motion for Issuance of a Request for Judicial Assistance 7 (“Samsung’s Motion”) and Exhibits 1-6 of the Declaration of Sam Stake in Support of Samsung’s 8 Motion contain Apple-confidential material. (See Declaration of Sam Stake in Support of 9 Samsung’s Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal [Dkt. No. 707-1].) Specifically: 10 • Exhibit 1 consists of excerpts from the deposition of Joshua Strickon. Page 11 191 and lines 192:1-10 contain discussions of notes from an early development 12 meeting involving prototypes and design decisions, and should be sealed. A 13 proposed redacted version is attached as Exhibit A. 14 • Exhibit 2 consists of excerpts from the deposition of Brian Huppi. Pages 129- 15 132 contain discussions of early product development, including initial 16 mockups and prototypes, and should be sealed. A proposed redacted version is 17 attached as Exhibit B. 18 • Exhibits 3 and 4 are an early design document and an email, respectively, each 19 of which consists of a discussion of an early project and prototype that were in 20 development. The project and prototype discussed are highly confidential, and 21 the documents should be sealed in their entirety. 22 • Exhibit 5 consists of excerpts from the deposition of Christopher Stringer. 23 Pages 105-107 consist of a discussion of the confidential early development 24 project and prototype referenced above and should be sealed. A proposed 25 redacted version is attached as Exhibit C. 26 27 • Exhibit 6 consists of excerpts from the deposition of Eugene Whang. Lines 47:3-6 and 47:10-12 refer to the confidential code name for the project 28 DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNGS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK sf-3104198 1 1 referenced above and should be sealed. A proposed redacted version is 2 attached as Exhibit D. • 3 4 5 Samsung’s Motion contains discussion of the aforementioned exhibits and should be sealed to the extent it refers to them. 3. It is Apple’s policy not to disclose or describe its trade secrets, product 6 development, or business practices to third parties. The above information is confidential to 7 Apple. It is indicative of the way that Apple manages its business affairs, designs its products and 8 conducts product development. Apple’s internal project code names reveal information that 9 Apple uses to maintain confidentiality with respect to its entire design and development process. 10 If disclosed, the information in the materials described above could be used by Apple’s 11 competitors to Apple’s disadvantage. The requested relief is necessary and narrowly tailored to 12 protect the confidentiality of this information. 13 I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that 14 the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that this Declaration was 15 executed this 9th day of February, 2012, at Cupertino, California. 16 17 Dated: February 9, 2012 By: /s/ Cyndi Wheeler ___________ Cyndi Wheeler 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNGS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK sf-3104198 2 1 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 2 I, Richard S.J. Hung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Cyndi Wheeler has 4 concurred in this filing. 5 Dated: February 9, 2012 6 By: /s/ Richard S.J. Hung Richard S.J. Hung 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNGS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK sf-3104198 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?