Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
718
Declaration of Cyndi Wheeler in Support of #707 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Unopposed Motion for Issuance of a Request for Judicial Assistance and related exhibits filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) #707 ) (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
10
11
12
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF
CYNDI WHEELER IN SUPPORT
OF SAMSUNG’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER
SEAL
Defendants.
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3104198
1
I, Cyndi Wheeler, do hereby declare as follows:
2
1.
I am an attorney for Apple Inc. (“Apple”). I submit this declaration in support of
3
Samsung’s Motion to File Documents Under Seal filed on February 2, 2012. [Dkt. No. 707.]
4
Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth below. If called as
5
a witness I could and would testify competently as follows.
6
2.
Samsung’s Unopposed Motion for Issuance of a Request for Judicial Assistance
7
(“Samsung’s Motion”) and Exhibits 1-6 of the Declaration of Sam Stake in Support of Samsung’s
8
Motion contain Apple-confidential material. (See Declaration of Sam Stake in Support of
9
Samsung’s Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal [Dkt. No. 707-1].) Specifically:
10
•
Exhibit 1 consists of excerpts from the deposition of Joshua Strickon. Page
11
191 and lines 192:1-10 contain discussions of notes from an early development
12
meeting involving prototypes and design decisions, and should be sealed. A
13
proposed redacted version is attached as Exhibit A.
14
•
Exhibit 2 consists of excerpts from the deposition of Brian Huppi. Pages 129-
15
132 contain discussions of early product development, including initial
16
mockups and prototypes, and should be sealed. A proposed redacted version is
17
attached as Exhibit B.
18
•
Exhibits 3 and 4 are an early design document and an email, respectively, each
19
of which consists of a discussion of an early project and prototype that were in
20
development. The project and prototype discussed are highly confidential, and
21
the documents should be sealed in their entirety.
22
•
Exhibit 5 consists of excerpts from the deposition of Christopher Stringer.
23
Pages 105-107 consist of a discussion of the confidential early development
24
project and prototype referenced above and should be sealed. A proposed
25
redacted version is attached as Exhibit C.
26
27
•
Exhibit 6 consists of excerpts from the deposition of Eugene Whang. Lines
47:3-6 and 47:10-12 refer to the confidential code name for the project
28
DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNGS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3104198
1
1
referenced above and should be sealed. A proposed redacted version is
2
attached as Exhibit D.
•
3
4
5
Samsung’s Motion contains discussion of the aforementioned exhibits and
should be sealed to the extent it refers to them.
3.
It is Apple’s policy not to disclose or describe its trade secrets, product
6
development, or business practices to third parties. The above information is confidential to
7
Apple. It is indicative of the way that Apple manages its business affairs, designs its products and
8
conducts product development. Apple’s internal project code names reveal information that
9
Apple uses to maintain confidentiality with respect to its entire design and development process.
10
If disclosed, the information in the materials described above could be used by Apple’s
11
competitors to Apple’s disadvantage. The requested relief is necessary and narrowly tailored to
12
protect the confidentiality of this information.
13
I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that
14
the forgoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that this Declaration was
15
executed this 9th day of February, 2012, at Cupertino, California.
16
17
Dated: February 9, 2012
By: /s/ Cyndi Wheeler ___________
Cyndi Wheeler
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNGS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3104198
2
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
2
I, Richard S.J. Hung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Cyndi Wheeler has
4
concurred in this filing.
5
Dated: February 9, 2012
6
By:
/s/ Richard S.J. Hung
Richard S.J. Hung
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF CYNDI WHEELER ISO SAMSUNGS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3104198
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?