Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 722

Proposed Order re #720 Opposition/Response to Motion, [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNGS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS by Apple Inc.. (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 19 21 22 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS Defendants. 18 20 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK Samsung’s failure to add five new references results from its own delays and does not demonstrate diligence. Samsung cannot show good cause, and therefore the Court hereby DENIES Samsung’s Motion to Supplement Its Invalidity Contentions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 24 25 Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?