Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 722

Proposed Order re #720 Opposition/Response to Motion, [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNGS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS by Apple Inc.. (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 2/9/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

19

21
22
23

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
SUPPLEMENT ITS INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS

Defendants.

18

20

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK

Samsung’s failure to add five new references results from its own delays and does not
demonstrate diligence. Samsung cannot show good cause, and therefore the Court hereby
DENIES Samsung’s Motion to Supplement Its Invalidity Contentions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

24
25

Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK