Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 737

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Cyndi Wheeler Declaration, #2 Declaration S. Calvin Walden Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 11, #5 Exhibit 12, #6 Exhibit 13, #7 Exhibit 14, #8 Exhibit 15, #9 Exhibit 16, #10 Exhibit 17, #11 Exhibit 18, #12 Exhibit 19, #13 Exhibit 20, #14 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 2/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 15 18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 19 Defendants. 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3108209 1 2 In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has moved for an order to seal the following documents: 3 1. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of S. Calvin Walden in 4 Support of Apple’s Motion to Compel Depositions of 14 of Samsung’s Purported “Apex” 5 Witnesses (“Walden Declaration”); and 6 2. 7 Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and GOOD Exhibits 2 through 10 and 21 through 25 to the Walden Declaration. 8 CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple’s Administrative Motion 9 to File Under Seal. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: By: Honorable Paul S. Grewal, U.S.M.J. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3108209

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?