Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 742

REPLY (re #738 MOTION to Shorten Time ) filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Mia Mazza in Support of Apple's Reply in Support of Motion to Shorten Time re "Apex" Witnesses, #2 Exhibit A)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 2/17/2012)

Exhibit 1

Page 1 of 3

Mazza, Mia
From:

Rachel Herrick Kassabian [[e-mail]]

Sent:

Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:39 AM

To:

Mazza, Mia

Cc:

AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; 'WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service'

Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Motion on Shortened Time re Apex Witnesses

Hi Mia,
Can you please clarify why you mean? What is the exact briefing and hearing schedule you are
proposing? Briefing over the weekend and a hearing a week later?
From: Mazza, Mia [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:38 AM
To: Rachel Herrick Kassabian
Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service
Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Motion on Shortened Time re Apex
Witnesses
Thanks Rachel.
We agree this is an important issue and we are sensitive to the Court's prior directives regarding
shortening time.
We would like to find a way for the parties to agree on a shortened briefing and hearing schedule on this
issue if possible.
We have determined that the Court is not hearing matters next week and thus we will be proposing a
hearing date of February 28.
In light of this change, we plan to propose the briefing schedule set forth below but without the restrictions
as to time of day.
We plan to file before noon today. Please let me know by 10 a.m. if there is a briefing schedule under
which Samsung will stipulate, subject to Court approval, to a hearing date of February 28.
Regards,

Mia Mazza
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
[phone] fax

From: Rachel Herrick Kassabian [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 4:31 AM
To: Mazza, Mia
Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; 'WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service'

2/17/2012

Page 2 of 3

Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Motion on Shortened Time re Apex Witnesses

Hi Mia,
Given the Court’s clear prior directives, and the importance of these apex issues, we cannot agree to litigate this
entire issue pursuant to the drastically shortened schedule you propose.
Regards,
Rachel
From: Mazza, Mia [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:17 AM
To: Rachel Herrick Kassabian
Cc: AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service
Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Motion on Shortened Time re Apex Witnesses

My apologies, a slight correction to the proposed schedule in light of ECF being offline for maintenance this
weekend:
Apple's opening brief: Thursday, February 16 by 9 a.m.
Samsung's opposition: Monday, February 20 by noon
Hearing to be proposed: Tuesday, February 21 at 10 a.m.
Please let us know as soon as possible whether Samsung stipulates to this schedule.
_____________________________________________
From: Mazza, Mia
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 9:04 AM
To:

'[e-mail]'

Cc:

AppleMoFo; '[e-mail]'; 'WH Apple Samsung NDCal Service'

Subject:

Apple v. Samsung: Discovery Correspondence - Motion on Shortened Time re Apex Witnesses

Hi Rachel,
At yesterday's meeting you requested 24 hours' notice of Apple's intention to seek shortened time on its motion to
compel regarding the "apex" issue.
We're giving you that notice now -- please let us know as soon as possible whether Samsung stipulates to this
schedule:
Apple's opening brief: Thursday, February 16 at 9 a.m.
Samsung's opposition: Sunday, February 19
Hearing to be proposed: Tuesday, February 21 at 10 a.m.

2/17/2012

Page 3 of 3

Regards,
Mia Mazza
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
[phone] fax

--------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you
that, if any advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication
(including any attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for
the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
For information about this legend, go to
http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the
addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the
message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you
that, if any advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication
(including any attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for
the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
For information about this legend, go to
http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/
============================================================================
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the
addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the
message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

2/17/2012