Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 751

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #715 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Administration to File Documents Under Seal STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE'S MOTION FOR RULE 37(B) SANCTIONS filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 2/22/2012)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
 San Francisco, California 94111
 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
 [e-mail]
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)

[e-mail]
 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)

[e-mail]
 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and
 Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



SAN JOSE DIVISION

 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
 APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK



Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:



Plaintiff,
vs.

 APPLE INC., a California corporation,


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION
FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS
March 27, 2012
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 5, 4th Floor
Hon. Paul S. Grewal

Defendant.




Case No. 11-CV-1846
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS

1

WHEREAS, on February 8, 2012, Plaintiff Apple moved for Rule 37(b)(2) sanctions

 against defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) (“Motion for Sanctions”);


WHEREAS, Samsung’s current deadline to respond to Apple’s Motion to for Sanctions

 is February 22, 2012;


WHEREAS, Apple’s current deadline to file its reply is February 29, 2012;



WHEREAS, due to an unforeseen personal emergency relating to Samsung’s counsel,

 Samsung requires additional time to prepare its response;


NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties

 that:


1.

The time for Samsung to respond to Apple’s Motion to for Sanctions shall be

 extended two (2) days, up to and including February 24, 2012; and


2.

The time for Apple to file its reply shall be extended two (2) days up to and

 including March 5, 2012.


3.

The stipulated schedule above will not affect the hearing date set for Apple’s

 motion.




DATED: February 22, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN
LLP





By

/s/ Richard Hung









Attorney for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

By /s/ Victoria Maroulis
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
Case No. 11-CV-1846
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS

1

ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE

2

I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to

3 file this Stipulation and Proposed order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I
4 hereby attest that Richard Hung has concurred in this filing.
5
6

Dated: February 22, 2012

/s/ Victoria F. Maroulis

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-1846
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5
6

Dated: ________________

By:
Honorable Paul S. Grewal

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-1846
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS