Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
753
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLES MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS by Judge Paul S. Grewal, granting #751 Stipulation (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2012)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 857-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:
Plaintiff,
vs.
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION
FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS
March 27, 2012
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 5, 4th Floor
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
Defendant.
Case No. 11-CV-1846
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS
1
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2012, Plaintiff Apple moved for Rule 37(b)(2) sanctions
against defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) (“Motion for Sanctions”);
WHEREAS, Samsung’s current deadline to respond to Apple’s Motion to for Sanctions
is February 22, 2012;
WHEREAS, Apple’s current deadline to file its reply is February 29, 2012;
WHEREAS, due to an unforeseen personal emergency relating to Samsung’s counsel,
Samsung requires additional time to prepare its response;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties
that:
1.
The time for Samsung to respond to Apple’s Motion to for Sanctions shall be
extended two (2) days, up to and including February 24, 2012; and
2.
The time for Apple to file its reply shall be extended two (2) days up to and
including March 5, 2012.
3.
The stipulated schedule above will not affect the hearing date set for Apple’s
motion.
DATED: February 22, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN
LLP
By
/s/ Richard Hung
Attorney for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
By /s/ Victoria Maroulis
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
Case No. 11-CV-1846
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
2
I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to
3 file this Stipulation and Proposed order. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I
4 hereby attest that Richard Hung has concurred in this filing.
5
6
Dated: February 22, 2012
/s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-1846
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
6
Dated:
By:
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-CV-1846
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR APPLE’S MOTION FOR RULE 37(b) SANCTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?