Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 766

MOTION for Leave to File Administrative Request for Leave to File Supplemental Mazza Declaration in Support of Apple's Motion to Compel Timely Production of Foreign-Language and Other Documents in Advance of Related Depositions filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Supplemental Declaration of Mia Mazza in Support of Apple's Motion to Compel Timely Production of Foreign-Language and Other Documents in Advance of Related Depositions, #2 Exhibit A-1 to the Supplemental Mazza Declaration, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Hung, Richard) (Filed on 3/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 23 Defendants. 24 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF MIA MAZZA IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODUCTION OF FOREIGNLANGUAGE AND OTHER DOCUMENTS IN ADVANCE OF RELATED DEPOSITIONS Date: Time: Place: Judge: March 6, 2012 10:00 a.m. Courtroom 5, 4th Floor Hon. Paul S. Grewal 25 26 27 28 SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3115356 1 I, Mia Mazza, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Apple Inc. 3 (“Apple”). I am licensed to practice law in the State of California. Unless otherwise indicated, I 4 have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein or understand them to be true from 5 members of my litigation team. I make this Supplemental Declaration in support of Apple’s 6 Reply in Support of its Motion to Compel Timely Production of Foreign Language and Other 7 Documents in Advance of Related Depositions (“Motion to Compel”). 8 9 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 is a table prepared by my litigation team that lists each Samsung witness deposed by Apple in Apple’s offensive case to date, the date and time of 10 the witness’s deposition, the date and time of any productions of documents sourced to that 11 witness, and the volume of each production in terms of both documents and pages. Exhibit A-1 is 12 an updated version of Exhibit A to my Declaration in Support of Apple’s February 23, 2012, 13 Reply in Support of the Motion to Compel. 14 3. As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Dong-Sub Kim was deposed on February 27, 2012 at 15 4 p.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this witness five or more days 16 before the deposition. Samsung then produced 419 Korean-language documents, totaling 4,858 17 pages, less than four days before the deposition. 18 4. As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Seung Hun Yoo was deposed on February 27, 2012 at 19 4 p.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 1 Korean-language document, totaling 27 pages, 44 days 20 before the deposition. Samsung then produced 6,184 Korean-language documents, totaling 21 30,277 pages, less than four days before the deposition. Samsung then produced another 668 22 documents, totaling 5,680 pages, five hours after the deposition started. 23 5. As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Deong Seok Ryu was deposed on February 29, 2012 at 24 9 a.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this custodian five or more days 25 before the deposition. Samsung then produced 3,209 Korean-language documents, totaling 26 23,263 pages, less than four days before the deposition. 27 28 SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3115356 1 1 6. As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Corey Kerstetter was deposed on February 29, 2012 at 2 11 a.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this custodian three or more 3 days before the deposition. Samsung then produced 3,055 documents, totaling 91,722 pages, less 4 than two days before the deposition. 5 7. As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Min Cheol Shin was deposed on March 1, 2012 at 6 4 p.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this custodian three or more 7 days before the deposition. Counsel for Apple sent two emails to counsel for Samsung on March 8 28 and 29, 2012, asking whether Samsung was going to produce any documents for this witness 9 and, if so, when and what volume. Samsung did not respond to either email. Samsung then 10 produced 1,421 documents, totaling 37,156 pages, 5 hours before the deposition. 11 8. As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Dong Hoon Chang is scheduled to be deposed on 12 March 6, 2012 at 4 p.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this custodian 13 five or more days before the deposition. Samsung then produced 314 Korean-language 14 documents, totaling 12,758 pages, less than four days before the deposition. 15 9. In total, since the filing of Apple’s reply brief in support of the Motion to Compel 16 ten days ago, Samsung has produced an additional 12,305 Korean-language documents totaling 17 115,791 pages less than five days before depositions, and 3,097 English-language documents 18 totaling 92,338 pages less than 5 days before depositions. Of these tardy Korean- and English- 19 language document productions combined, 5,144 documents totaling 134,558 pages were 20 produced less than 3 days before depositions. 21 10. As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Hye Jung Lee is scheduled to be deposed on March 5, 22 2012, at 4 p.m. Pacific Time; Seung Yun Lee is scheduled to be deposed on March 6, 2012 at 23 4 p.m. Pacific Time, Sung Hee Hwang is scheduled to be deposed on March 6, 2012 at 4 p.m. 24 Pacific Time, and Oh Chae Kwon is scheduled to be deposed on March 7, 2012 at 4 p.m. Pacific 25 Time. As of at least 9 p.m. Pacific Time on the date of this Declaration, Samsung had produced 0 26 // 27 // 28 SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3115356 2 1 documents sourced to any of these witnesses. Samsung produced some documents at 9:03 p.m. 2 Pacific Time tonight , but Apple will not know the custodian of those documents for several hours. 3 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on 4 5 6 March 4, 2012, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Mia Mazza Mia Mazza 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3115356 3 1 2 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE I, Richard S.J. Hung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Mia Mazza has 4 concurred in this filing. 5 Dated: March 4, 2012 /s/ Richard S.J. Hung Richard S.J. Hung 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3115356 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?