Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
766
MOTION for Leave to File Administrative Request for Leave to File Supplemental Mazza Declaration in Support of Apple's Motion to Compel Timely Production of Foreign-Language and Other Documents in Advance of Related Depositions filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Supplemental Declaration of Mia Mazza in Support of Apple's Motion to Compel Timely Production of Foreign-Language and Other Documents in Advance of Related Depositions, #2 Exhibit A-1 to the Supplemental Mazza Declaration, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Hung, Richard) (Filed on 3/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
17
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
23
Defendants.
24
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
SUPPLEMENTAL
DECLARATION OF MIA MAZZA
IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S
MOTION TO COMPEL TIMELY
PRODUCTION OF FOREIGNLANGUAGE AND OTHER
DOCUMENTS IN ADVANCE OF
RELATED DEPOSITIONS
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:
March 6, 2012
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 5, 4th Floor
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
25
26
27
28
SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3115356
1
I, Mia Mazza, declare as follows:
2
1.
I am a partner in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Apple Inc.
3
(“Apple”). I am licensed to practice law in the State of California. Unless otherwise indicated, I
4
have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein or understand them to be true from
5
members of my litigation team. I make this Supplemental Declaration in support of Apple’s
6
Reply in Support of its Motion to Compel Timely Production of Foreign Language and Other
7
Documents in Advance of Related Depositions (“Motion to Compel”).
8
9
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit A-1 is a table prepared by my litigation team that lists
each Samsung witness deposed by Apple in Apple’s offensive case to date, the date and time of
10
the witness’s deposition, the date and time of any productions of documents sourced to that
11
witness, and the volume of each production in terms of both documents and pages. Exhibit A-1 is
12
an updated version of Exhibit A to my Declaration in Support of Apple’s February 23, 2012,
13
Reply in Support of the Motion to Compel.
14
3.
As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Dong-Sub Kim was deposed on February 27, 2012 at
15
4 p.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this witness five or more days
16
before the deposition. Samsung then produced 419 Korean-language documents, totaling 4,858
17
pages, less than four days before the deposition.
18
4.
As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Seung Hun Yoo was deposed on February 27, 2012 at
19
4 p.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 1 Korean-language document, totaling 27 pages, 44 days
20
before the deposition. Samsung then produced 6,184 Korean-language documents, totaling
21
30,277 pages, less than four days before the deposition. Samsung then produced another 668
22
documents, totaling 5,680 pages, five hours after the deposition started.
23
5.
As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Deong Seok Ryu was deposed on February 29, 2012 at
24
9 a.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this custodian five or more days
25
before the deposition. Samsung then produced 3,209 Korean-language documents, totaling
26
23,263 pages, less than four days before the deposition.
27
28
SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3115356
1
1
6.
As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Corey Kerstetter was deposed on February 29, 2012 at
2
11 a.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this custodian three or more
3
days before the deposition. Samsung then produced 3,055 documents, totaling 91,722 pages, less
4
than two days before the deposition.
5
7.
As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Min Cheol Shin was deposed on March 1, 2012 at
6
4 p.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this custodian three or more
7
days before the deposition. Counsel for Apple sent two emails to counsel for Samsung on March
8
28 and 29, 2012, asking whether Samsung was going to produce any documents for this witness
9
and, if so, when and what volume. Samsung did not respond to either email. Samsung then
10
produced 1,421 documents, totaling 37,156 pages, 5 hours before the deposition.
11
8.
As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Dong Hoon Chang is scheduled to be deposed on
12
March 6, 2012 at 4 p.m. Pacific Time. Samsung produced 0 documents sourced to this custodian
13
five or more days before the deposition. Samsung then produced 314 Korean-language
14
documents, totaling 12,758 pages, less than four days before the deposition.
15
9.
In total, since the filing of Apple’s reply brief in support of the Motion to Compel
16
ten days ago, Samsung has produced an additional 12,305 Korean-language documents totaling
17
115,791 pages less than five days before depositions, and 3,097 English-language documents
18
totaling 92,338 pages less than 5 days before depositions. Of these tardy Korean- and English-
19
language document productions combined, 5,144 documents totaling 134,558 pages were
20
produced less than 3 days before depositions.
21
10.
As set forth in Exhibit A-1, Hye Jung Lee is scheduled to be deposed on March 5,
22
2012, at 4 p.m. Pacific Time; Seung Yun Lee is scheduled to be deposed on March 6, 2012 at
23
4 p.m. Pacific Time, Sung Hee Hwang is scheduled to be deposed on March 6, 2012 at 4 p.m.
24
Pacific Time, and Oh Chae Kwon is scheduled to be deposed on March 7, 2012 at 4 p.m. Pacific
25
Time. As of at least 9 p.m. Pacific Time on the date of this Declaration, Samsung had produced 0
26
//
27
//
28
SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3115356
2
1
documents sourced to any of these witnesses. Samsung produced some documents at 9:03 p.m.
2
Pacific Time tonight , but Apple will not know the custodian of those documents for several hours.
3
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
4
5
6
March 4, 2012, at San Francisco, California.
/s/ Mia Mazza
Mia Mazza
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS
CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3115356
3
1
2
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
I, Richard S.J. Hung, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Mia Mazza has
4
concurred in this filing.
5
Dated: March 4, 2012
/s/ Richard S.J. Hung
Richard S.J. Hung
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SUPPLEMENTAL MAZZA DECL. ISO REPLY ISO APPLE’S MOT. TO COMPEL TIMELY PRODN. OF DOCUMENTS
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3115356
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?