Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
777
Proposed Order re #747 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 305, receipt number 0971-6603129.) by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Singer, Benjamin) (Filed on 3/6/2012)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
3
4 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF
ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
Plaintiff,
6
vs.
7 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
8 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
9 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
10
Defendants.
11
12
Edward H. Rice, whose business address and telephone number are: Hopenfeld Singer
13
14 Rice & Saito LLP, 30 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 2200, Chicago, IL 60606, tel: (312) 953-4566 and
15 who is an active member in good standing of the bar of Illinois and Missouri having applied in the
16 above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of California on a pro hac
17 vice basis, representing defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America,
18 Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the application is granted, subject to the terms and
19
20 conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac
21 vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application
22 will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements
23 contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?