Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
799
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 [Redacted Public Version] Apple's Combined Reply, #3 Proposed Order, #4 [Redacted Public Version] Declaration of Mia Mazza in Support of Apple's Combined Reply, #5 Exhibit 1 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza, #6 Exhibit 2 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza, #7 Exhibit 3 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza, #8 Exhibit 4 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza, #9 Exhibit 33 to [Redacted Public Version] of Declaration of Mia Mazza)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 3/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR A
PROTECTIVE ORDER
15
18
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
19
Defendants.
16
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3117384
1
On February 23, 2012, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America,
2
Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (“Samsung”) moved for a protective order
3
seeking to prevent Apple Inc. (“Apple”) from deposing ten of Samsung’s employees (Dkt. 754-
4
2). Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, the Court hereby
5
DENIES Samsung’s Notice of Motion and Motion for a Protective Order.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3117384
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?