Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 802

ORDER by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying as moot #638 Stipulation (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, a ) Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New ) York corporation; SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, ) LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 11-1846 LHK (PSG) ORDER DENYING AS MOOT STIPULATED PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME (Re: Docket No. 638) 19 On January 17, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation requesting that Samsung be permitted 20 additional time to file any objections to an earlier court order related to expert witness review of 21 design-related materials deemed confidential under the parties’ protective order.1 At the time of 22 filing the stipulated request, the parties were awaiting a decision on Samsung’s motion for 23 clarification related to the earlier court order. Since the court rendered its decision on that motion in 24 late January 2012,2 neither party has taken further action related to the stipulation or to filing 25 objections to the earlier court order. The court therefore finds the request to enlarge time to be moot, 26 27 1 Docket No. 638. 2 See Docket No. 673. 28 ORDER, page 1 1 and hereby DENIES the stipulated proposed order on that basis. 2 Dated: 3/13/2012 3 4 PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER, page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?