Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 845

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Exhibit D to the Reply Declaration of Marc J. Pernick in Support of Apple's Rule 37(b)(2) Motion Based on Samsung's Violation of the Court's December 22, 2011 Order Regarding Source Code filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Pernick Reply Declaration, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 3/30/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v. 18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 19 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL Defendants. 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3127487 1 2 In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has moved for an order to seal the following documents: 3 1. Exhibit D to the Reply Declaration of Marc J. Pernick in Support of Apple’s Rule 4 37(b)(2) Motion Based on Samsung’s Violation of the Court’s December 22, 2011 Order 5 Regarding Source Code. 6 Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and GOOD 7 CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple’s Motion to File Under 8 Seal. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3127487

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?