Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
858
RESPONSE (re #856 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Response to Apple's Corrected Reply In Support of Rule 37(b)(2) Motion ) Apple's Opposition to Samsung's Administrative Request for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Apple's Reply in Support of Rule 37(b)(2) Motion re Samsung's Violation of January 27, 2012 Damages Discovery Order filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 4/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SUR-REPLY
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
19
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Defendants.
16
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3130591
1
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-11, Samsung has submitted an
2
administrative request for leave to file a sur-reply to Apple’s reply in support of its Rule 37(b)(2)
3
Motion re Samsung’s Violation of January 27, 2012 Damages Discovery Order. (Dkt. No. 856.)
4
5
Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, the Court
hereby DENIES the requested leave.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
By:
Dated: April ___, 2012
Honorable Paul S. Grewal, U.S.M.J.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3130591
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?