Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 886

MOTION Conditional Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge Apple's Conditional Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge filed by Apple Inc.. Responses due by 5/10/2012. Replies due by 5/17/2012. (Tucher, Alison) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21
22

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK

APPLE’S CONDITIONAL
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE
JUDGE

23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S CONDITIONAL MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3136492

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 72-2, Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), Apple

2

moves for relief from the April 12 nondispositive pretrial Order (1) Granting-in-Part Defendants’

3

Motion to Compel Production of Certain Design Patents; (2) Granting-In-Part Defendants’

4

Motion to Compel Production of Materials from Related Proceedings and to Enforce December

5

22, 2011 Court Order [Dkt. No. 867] (“April 12 Order”). Apple submits this conditional motion

6

solely as a precautionary measure to avoid waiver of Apple’s objections to the order pursuant to

7

Rule 72(a). This motion is based on the Administrative Motion for Clarification (filed

8

simultaneously herewith at Docket No. 885) and supporting papers, incorporated herein by

9

reference.

10

Apple respectfully requests that the Court grant relief from the portions of the April 12

11

Order addressed in the Administrative Motion, if the Administrative Motion is decided in whole

12

or in part against Apple.

13
14
15

Dated: April 26, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

16
17
18
19

By:

/s/ Alison M. Tucher
ALISON M. TUCHER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE’S CONDITIONAL MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3136492

1