Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 887

Declaration of Mia Mazza In Support Of Apples Administrative Motion For Clarification Regarding April 12 Order filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24)(Tucher, Alison) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

Exhibit 2

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Mazza, Mia
Sunday, April 15, 2012 5:55 PM
'Diane Hutnyan'
AppleMoFo; Samsung v. Apple; [e-mail]
RE: Apple v. Samsung Proposal Regarding 796 Transcripts
2012-04-15 Ltr Mazza to Hutnyan re 796 transcripts.pdf

Diane:
In light of Judge Grewal’s April 12, 2012, Order, Apple agrees that all transcripts of depositions taken in
Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-796 (“ITC 796”) are
deemed produced in Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.) (the “N.D. Cal. case”).
Apple reserves its right to challenge admissibility of ITC 796 transcripts in the N.D. Cal. case.
Regards,
Mia Mazza
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
[phone] office
[phone] mobile
[phone] fax

From: Diane Hutnyan [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 3:36 PM
To: Mazza, Mia
Cc: Samsung v. Apple; [e-mail]; AppleMoFo
Subject: Apple v. Samsung Proposal Regarding 796 Transcripts

Dear Mia,  

In light of the Court’s ruling that 796 deposition transcripts are relevant and must be produced, and given that rebuttal 
expert reports are due on Monday, will Apple agree that the 796 deposition transcripts are immediately deemed 
produced in this action?  This would prevent both sides from having to do supplemental reports and an additional round 
of expert depositions when the materials are produced later this month.  Please let us know today.   

Thank you. 

Diane Cafferata Hutnyan |

partner | quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp

865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Direct: [phone]
Main Phone: [phone]
Main Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Web: www.quinnemanuel.com 
1

Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dianehutnyan

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s)
named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and
confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. 

2

425 MARKET STREET
SAN FRANCISCO
CALIFORNIA 94105-2482
U.S.A.

MO RRI SO N & F O E RST E R L LP

TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: 415.268.7522

T O K YO , L O N D O N , BR U SSE L S,
BE I JI N G , SH AN G H AI , H O N G K O N G

N E W YO RK , SAN F RAN C I SCO ,
L O S A N G E L E S, P A L O A L T O ,
SAC RAME N T O , SAN D I E G O ,
D E N VE R, N O RT H E RN VI RG I N I A,
WASH I N G T O N , D .C.

WWW.MOFO.COM

April 15, 2012

Writer’s Direct Contact
415.268.6024
[e-mail]

By Email ([e-mail])
Diane Hutnyan
Quinn Emanuel
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Re:

Apple v. Samsung, Case No. 11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.)

Dear Diane:
This letter responds to your email sent the afternoon of Friday, April 13, 2012.
In light of Judge Grewal’s April 12, 2012, Order, Apple agrees that all transcripts of
depositions taken in Certain Electronic Digital Media Devices and Components Thereof,
ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-796 (“ITC 796”) are deemed produced in Apple v. Samsung, Case No.
11-cv-1846-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal.) (the “N.D. Cal. case”).
Apple reserves its right to challenge admissibility of ITC 796 transcripts in the N.D. Cal.
case.
Sincerely,
/s/ Mia Mazza
Mia Mazza
cc:

S. Calvin Walden
Peter Kolovos

sf-3133316