Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 888

Proposed Order Granting Apples Administrative Motion For Clarification Of April 12 Order by Apple Inc.. (Tucher, Alison) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
OF APRIL 12 ORDER

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3138429

1

Apple seeks an order clarifying the Court’s April 12 Order. Having considered the

2

arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, Apple’s Motion for Clarification is

3

GRANTED.

4

The April 12 Order compelling production of unredacted court documents does not

5

require Apple to produce documents in violation of ITC protective orders or Local Rules. To the

6

extent ITC protective orders or Local Rules do not have an exception that allows for production

7

pursuant to a court order, Apple is relieved of any requirement to produce confidential documents

8

from court files in the applicable cases.

9

Moreover, the April 12 Order compelling additional depositions permits Samsung to take

10

only those depositions that are reasonably necessary to mitigate prejudice caused by Apple’s late

11

production of transcripts pursuant to the Order.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

Dated: May _____, 2012.

14
15
16

HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3138429