Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 917

Proposed Order Denying Samsungs Motion To Seal Portions Of Hearing Transcript (Dkt. No. 855) Pursuant To General Order No. 59 by Apple Inc.. (Hung, Richard) (Filed on 5/11/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

17
18
19
20
21

Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

22
Defendants.

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SEAL
PORTIONS OF HEARING
TRANSCRIPT (DKT. NO. 855)
PURSUANT TO GENERAL
ORDER NO. 59
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

June 5, 2012
10:00 a.m.
Courtroom 5, 4th Floor
Hon. Paul S. Grewal

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sd-589821

1

1

The Court having considered the supporting and opposing papers submitted in connection

2

with Samsung’s Motion to Seal Portions of Hearing Transcript (Dkt. No. 855) Pursuant to

3

General Order No. 59, as well as the arguments made by counsel at the June 5, 2012 hearing, and

4

good cause appearing,

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

6

Samsung’s Motion to Seal Portions of Hearing Transcript (Dkt. No. 855) Pursuant to

7

General Order No. 59 is DENIED.

8
9
10

Dated: _____________
Honorable Paul S. Grewal

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sd-589821

1