Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
978
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Samsung's Motion For Leave To Seek Reconsideration of the Court's May 21, 2012 Order, #2 Declaration of Thomas Watson, #3 Exhibit 4, #4 Exhibit 17, #5 Exhibit 18, #6 Exhibit 19, #7 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Motion for Leave, #8 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/26/2012)
EXHIBIT 18
-2-
Reply
Office
to
Action
of November
13,
Amendments
Please
[0011 ] The
•
part
.•
r
.........
of
the
paragraph
amend
claimed
broken
:...•.•.,:•_
lines
to
[0011]
ANDRE
2009
the
are
Specification
show[ [ing] ] portions
•r
al.
29/332,683
follows:
as
v'•ortions
et
No.
DEVICE
Appl.
•,•
•r
t•t•wD
of the
nxrt•
ELECTRONIC
t•t•vt,'•t•
which
•,,.,.--.C"*•n
no
design.
Atty.
Dkt.
No.
2607.0580002(P4984USD2)/TGD
APL-ITC796-0000003880
JX-0008 pg. 191 of 213
-3-
Reply
Office
to
Action
ANDRE
Appl.
2009
13,
of November
et
al.
29/332,683
No.
Remarks
Reconsideration
Examiner
the
thank
for
contained
in
5,
during
The
2009.
of
substance
to
conducted
by
interview
is
doctrine
interview
the
wish
Applicants
requested.
of
the
remarks
patenting
A
claimed
design
the
over
disclaimer
terminal
judicially
the
under
rejected
was
created
herewith
submitted
is
co-pending
applicant's
in
to
overcome
rejection.
FIG.
7
elongated
[the
right
of
oval
to
publication]
have
and
proper
'059
prior
29/282,831,
and
to
edges,
rounded
more
to
the
modify
the
remove
it
that
have
would
oval
the
56
Figure
in
extend
to
the
left
and
by Fig
56
of
[the
'083
the
design
to
demonstrated
as
"modify
to
elongated
the
shown
design
obvious
display
rectangular
of the
portion
been
taught by
as
border
inner
left
."
need
Applicants
the
and
the
to
of
view
Examiner
The
publication).
'083
being
as
in
patent)
'059
(the
(the
§103(a)
U.S.C.
35
Fujisawa
similar
"strickingly
patent]"
publication]
edges
is
patent
'059
[the
'083
side
'059
the
that
alleges
to
under
rejected
2008/0004083
Publication
Application
been
7,409,059
also
No.
Patent
U.S.
over
Patent
U.S.
has
design
claimed
unpatentable
in
November
29/328,018.
no.
The
of
consideration
double
obviousness-type
application
and
time
design
claimed
respectfully
is
Application
on
following
the
The
in
her
representatives
Applicants'
this
this
of
for
obvious
patent
are
art
reference.
which
address
not
is
The
a
continuation
whether
several
present
of
modifications
such
First,
reasons.
application
Application
Atty.
is
a
the
to
'083
divisional
No.
29/270,887,
Dkt.
No.
publication
of
disclosed
is
not
Application
filed
January
a
No.
5,
2607.0580002(P4984USD2)/TGD
APL-ITC796-0000003881
JX-0008 pg. 192 of 213
4
-
Reply
to
2007.
Thus
MPEP
Office
Action
the
does
reference
102(a)/102(b)
a
postdates
Thus,
the
the
publication
'083
application
and
Although
subject
the
of
matter
'059
is
patent
obviousness
has
the
not
been
appearance,
493
F.2d
In
teachings
support
it
concept;
MPEP
§
the
the
there
is
at
388,
prior
least
reference
In
of
the
an
'083
available
only
2008,
which
the
12
Harvey,
re
disclosed
one
in the
major
of
673
'059
difference
the
F.2d
reference
(Fed.
patent
has
which
Atty.
same
Cir.
some
creates
Dkt.
No.
the
prior
not
in
than
more
the
as
Yardley,
re
The
"Therefore,
be
into
taken
design,
claimed
390.
must
the
1061
at
overall
determining
appearance").
of
appearance
F.3d
in
In
of
case
the
be
also
consideration
basic
substantially
appearance
See
disclosed
is
it
must
1982).
similarity
Rosen,
design,
a
if the
facie
prima
a
present
even
design
the
which
whole,
a
(C.C.P.A.
is
primary
a
that
of
to
rejection,
that
assert
design
as
390
art
re
of the
patentability
visual
obviousness,
design
See
§706.02(f)(1).
MPEP
See
merits
the
1974) (" [the]
design.
In
3,
January
102(e)
or
claimed
design
the
overall
(citing
1504.3
English,
of
Applicants
art,
the
to
(C.C.P.A.
an
in
is
application.
address
prior
F.2d
673
Rosen,
have
must
While
design,
of
effect
of
2007.
phase application
publication
'083
date
102(b)
determining
In
made.
claimed
the
5,
January
published
not
present
not
similar
the
holding
a
is
over
the
of
components
need
suggest
must
of
al.
improper.
a
designs
of
date
national
a
publication
102(a),
is
1392-1393
1389,
patentability
re
the
not
so
visual
consideration.
of
publication
'083
its
is
Applicants
the
is
Therefore,
of
date
rejection
the
date.
as
filing
effective
publication
2006/038499)
102(e)
a
filing
et
29/332,683
No.
Appl.
effective
an
'083
(WO
have
not
has
the
application
publication
in
Because
ANDRE
-
2009
13,
application
present
§706.02(VI).
international
as
of November
just
order
a
claimed
art
to
design
design."
1993)).
similarities
an
to
overall
the
claimed
ornamental
2607.0580002(P4984USD2)/TGD
APL-ITC796-0000003882
JX-0008 pg. 193 of 213
5
-
Reply
to
Office
disclosed
the
'059
from
both
front
face
of
'059
patent
flush
with
the
is
there
front
face
substantially
of
the
smooth
the
create
a
there
is
between
the
transition
32.
See
of
top
of
11
12
design.
In
12
the
and
creating
display
display
of
the
an
the
in
the
make
fact, Figure
12
of the
the
on
in contrast
rest
it
3 suggests
transition
screen
the
that
would
which
is
seen
nothing
is
uneven
and
screen
best
such
32
There
which
As
1-5.
housing
design
12
screen
5, lns.
display
claimed
the
of
display
col.
area
telephone
mobile
appearance.
display
housing
the
a
display
on
in
as
has
framed
or
around
multiple
anything
face
face
of
in
the
claimed
suggests
21
that
and
the
the
for
cited
features
such
is
nothing
21
design.
21
remainder
In
of
is
that
the
to
front
face
the
publication
'083
it
make
fact,
the
56
in
Fig
claimed.
as
speakers
in
also
inset
and
of the
front
face.
in
flush
embodiment
that
See
there
and
161,
is
an
paragraph
The
'083
which
lenses
to
the
of
speakers
that
publication
'083
switches,
as
these
addresses
The
purpose.
continuous,
would
which
which
publication
'083
substantially
is
that
embodiment
display
it
was
display
top
from
nor
There
on
as
disclosure
functional
surface.
differs
display
the
patent,
front
discontinuous
employed,
in
'059
a
discloses
only
frame
flush
or
disclose
patent
which
32
between
nothing
is
in
front
housing
which
11
in
anything
is
the
housing
stepped
a
of
al.
design.
deficiencies
the
is inset
or
32
section
12
there
of
edge
claimed
not
that
face
display
feature
et
29/332,683
No.
Appl.
distinctive
of the
creates
bevel
There
does
32
housing
of
a
screen
front
a
is
A
ANDRE
-
2009
and. back
patent,
suggest
to
different.
front
housing
13,
November
patent
the
2 of the
Figure
that
is
in
visible
of
quite
that
appearance
in
Action
that
suggest
transition
5
Figures
162
uneven
[0218]
and
with
6,
and
163
are
transition
of
the
'083
publication.
Atty.
Dkt.
No.
2607.0580002(P4984USD2)/TGD
APL-ITC796-0000003883
JX-0008 pg. 194 of 213
6
-
Reply
to
Office
Action
Furthermore,
completely
from
the
while
completely
disclosures
neither
of
those
that
Appl.
calls
the
Both
transparent.
for
up
the
surface
designs
cited
designs
make
areas
ANDRE
-
2009
design
claimed
the
transparent,
substantially
13,
of November
discloses
disclose
only
a
display
a
portion
of
surface
a
that
but
it is clear
area,
the
al.
substantially
be
to
et
29/332,683
No.
front
face
is
of
the
device.
Because
impression
the
neither
of
a
substantially
front
face
of
Based
design
is not
of
the
on
device,
the
flush
or
they
above
amendment
be
said
and
to
render
remarks,
on
display
the
between
suggests
or
surface
transparent
transition
cannot
discloses
references
continuous
substantially
smooth
cited
the
the
claimed
Applicants
the
overall
device
electronic
an
screen
and
visual
the
rest
design
that
of
the
obvious.
submit
and
the
claimed
obvious.
Atty.
Dkt.
No.
2607.0580002(P4984USD2)/TGD
APL-ITC796-0000003884
JX-0008 pg. 195 of 213
ANDRE
-7-
Reply
to
Office
of November
Action
13,
2009
No.
Appl.
et
al.
29/332,683
Conclusion
All
of
the
accommodated,
Action
and,
as
believes,
Examiner
prosecution
the
that
of
number
full
a
such,
for
and
the
any
application,
this
outstanding
complete
present
the
application
that
reason,
respectfully
been
has
is
in
made
to
the
outstanding
the
allowance.
If the
will
expedite
the
telephone
to
that
withdrawn.
be
communication
invited
is
they
for
traversed,
request
that
condition
personal
Examiner
and
rejections
reply
properly
been
therefore
Applicants
presently
have
rejection
of
moot.
all
believe
Applicants
Office
rendered
or
reconsider
Examiner
grounds
stated
undersigned
at
provided.
and
Prompt
consideration
favorable
of this
Amendment
and
Reply
is
respectfully
requested.
submitted,
Respectfully
STERNE, KESSLER,
•G.
Attorney
January
1100
New
York
Washington,
(202)
27,
D.C.
•
FOX
P.L.L.C.
Durkin
for
Registration
Date:
GOLDSTEIN
Applicants
No.
32,831
2010
Avenue,
N.W.
20005-3934
371-2600
1072966_2.DOC
Atty.
Dkt.
No.
2607.0580002(P4984USD2)/TGD
APL-ITC796-0000003885
JX-0008 pg. 196 of 213
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?