Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
981
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting #961 Stipulation (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document961 Filed05/21/12 Page1 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No.
170151)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC
11
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
23
v.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING CLAIMS
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4769242.1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3148137
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document961 Filed05/21/12 Page2 of 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Additional attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf- 3148137
02198.51855/4769242.1
1
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document961 Filed05/21/12 Page3 of 6
1
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and the Court’s May 10, 2012
3
Order Regarding Parties’ Statements Narrowing Claims to be Asserted at Trial (Dkt. No. 912),
4
the parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
5
WHEREAS, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) commenced the above-captioned action (the
6
“Litigation”) against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and
7
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung,” and together with Apple,
8
“the Parties” and individually each a “Party”) on April 15, 2011;
9
10
11
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s May 2, 2012 Case Management Order, a trial in this
action shall commence on July 30, 2012 (Dkt. No. 901);
WHEREAS, both parties have previously represented to each other and to the Court that
12
each is willing to dismiss certain claims and counterclaims in the interests of streamlining and
13
simplifying the issues in this case (Dkt. Nos. 893, 902);
14
WHEREAS, the Court’s May 10 Order instructed that the parties file a stipulation
15
dismissing without prejudice the claims and counterclaims that will not be tried on July 30, 2012;
16
17
18
19
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties as
follows:
1.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice any claims by Apple
against Samsung for infringement of:
20
a.
U.S. Patent No. 6,493,002 (Eighth Claim for Relief);
21
b.
Claims 1-18 and 20 of U.S. Patent No. 7,469,381 (Ninth Claim for Relief);
22
c.
Claim 1-3, 6-7, 10, and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 7,663,607 (Tenth Claim for
Relief);
23
24
d.
U.S. Patent No. 7,812,828 (Eleventh Claim for Relief);
25
e.
Claims 1-7 and 9-21 of U.S. Patent No. 7,844,915 (Twelfth Claim for
Relief);
26
27
f.
U.S. Patent No. 7,853,891 (Thirteenth Claim for Relief);
28
g.
Claims 2, 4-13, 17-18, 27-42, 47-49, and 51-52 of U.S. Patent No.
7,864,163 (Fourteenth Claim for Relief);
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf- 3148137
02198.51855/4769242.1
1
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document961 Filed05/21/12 Page4 of 6
1
2
h.
U.S. Patent No. 7,920,129 (Fifteenth Claim for Relief);
3
i.
U.S. Patent No. D627,790 (Sixteenth Claim for Relief);
4
j.
U.S. Patent No. D622,270 (Twenty-Second Claim for Relief);
5
k.
iPhone trade dress, based on U.S. Registration No. 3,470,983 (First and
Second Claims for Relief);
6
l.
7
iPhone trade dress, based on unregistered combination iPhone/iPhone
3G/iPhone 4 trade dress (First Claim for Relief);
8
m.
9
iPhone trade dress, based on unregistered iPhone 3G trade dress (First
Claim for Relief);
10
n.
11
Registered Trademarks 3,889,642; 3,886,200; 3,889,685; 3,886,169; and
12
3,886,197; 3,886,196; 2,935,038; and 3,889,642 (Third and Fifth Claims
13
for Relief);
o.
14
15
16
2.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice any claims by Apple
against Samsung for infringement and dilution of:
a.
17
iPhone trade dress, based on U.S. Registration No. 3,457,218 (First,
Second, and Fourth Claims for Relief);
18
b.
19
iPhone trade dress, based on U.S. Registration No. 3,475,327 (First,
Second, and Fourth Claims for Relief);
20
c.
21
iPhone trade dress, based on unregistered original iPhone trade dress (First
and Fourth Claims for Relief); and
22
d.
23
iPhone trade dress, based on unregistered iPhone 4 trade dress (First and
Fourth Claims for Relief).
24
25
Unregistered Trademarks (Fifth Claim for Relief).
3.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice claims by Apple against
26
Samsung for unfair business practices under California Business and Professions Code Section
27
17200 pursuant to the Sixth Claim for Relief.
28
4.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice claims by Apple against
Samsung for Unjust Enrichment pursuant to the Seventh Claim for Relief.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf- 3148137
02198.51855/4769242.1
2
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document961 Filed05/21/12 Page5 of 6
1
2
5.
Samsung agrees that its corresponding counterclaims seeking declaratory
3
judgment of non-infringement and invalidity for Apple’s dismissed claims for patent, trademark,
4
and trade dress infringement, as well as Samsung’s counterclaims for a declaration of
5
nonviolation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200 and cancelation of Apple’s
6
dismissed registered trademarks and trade dress, should be dismissed without prejudice. This
7
stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is made subject to Samsung’s reservation of rights to
8
reassert these or other counterclaims and defenses relating to Apple’s dismissed claims should
9
any such dismissed claim be revived or reasserted by Apple for any reason.
10
6.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice any claims by Samsung
11
Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, the
12
“Samsung Patent Counterclaimants”) against Apple for infringement of:
13
a.
U.S. Patent No. 7,050,410;
14
b.
U.S. Patent No. 7,069,055;
15
c.
U.S. Patent No. 7,200,792;
16
d.
U.S. Patent No. 7,386,001;
17
e.
U.S. Patent No. 7,079,871;
18
f.
Claims 1, 2, 4, 6-9, 13, 16-18 of U.S. Patent No. 7,675,941;
19
g.
Claims 1-4, 6, 10-12, 19-22 and 24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,604;
20
h.
Claims 1-6, 9-10, 14, 18-20, 23-24 and 28 of U.S. Patent No. 7,447,516;
21
i.
Claims 27 and 30 of U.S. Patent No. 7,362,867;
22
j.
Claims 1-2, 7-8 and 15-18. of U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711; and
23
k.
Claims 1-4, 6-8, 11 and 13-16 of U.S. Patent No. 7,546,893.
24
7.
Apple agrees that its corresponding counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment of
25
non-infringement and invalidity for the Samsung Patent Counterclaimants’ dismissed claims
26
should be dismissed without prejudice. This stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is made
27
subject to Apple’s reservation of rights to reassert these or other counterclaims and defenses
28
relating to the Samsung Patent Counterclaimants’ dismissed claims should any such dismissed
claim be revived or reasserted by the Samsung Patent Counterclaimants for any reason.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf- 3148137
02198.51855/4769242.1
3
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document961 Filed05/21/12 Page6 of 6
1
2
3
8.
This Stipulation and Order is not an adjudication on the merits of any of the claims
or counterclaims that are hereby dismissed without prejudice.
4
5
Dated: May 21, 2012
6
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
By: /s/ Harold McElhinny
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
ALISON M. TUCHER
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
JASON R. BARTLETT
By: /s/ Todd Bridges
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
WILLIAM F. LEE
MARK D. SELWYN
14
Attorneys for APPLE INC.
15
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
May 29, 2012
Dated: ___________________, 2012
By:
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf- 3148137
02198.51855/4769242.1
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?