Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 999

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Seal, #2 Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts, #3 Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of Samsung's Opposition, #4 Exhibit A to the Martin Declaration, #5 Exhibit B to the Martin Declaration, #6 Exhibit C to the Martin Declaration, #7 Exhibit D to the Martin Declaration, #8 Exhibit E to the Martin Declaration, #9 Exhibit F to the Martin Declaration, #10 Exhibit G to the Martin Declaration, #11 Exhibit H to the Martin Declaration, #12 Exhibit I to the Martin Declaration, #13 Exhibit J to the Martin Declaration, #14 Exhibit K to the Martin Declaration, #15 Exhibit L to the Martin Declaration, #16 Exhibit M to the Martin Declaration, #17 Exhibit N to the Martin Declaration, #18 Exhibit O to the Martin Declaration, #19 Exhibit P to the Martin Declaration, #20 Exhibit Q to the Martin Declaration, #21 Exhibit R to the Martin Declaration, #22 Exhibit S to the Martin Declaration, #23 Proposed Order Denying Apple's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Samsung's Experts)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/31/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

10 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
11
12

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG

Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
APPLE’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE
TESTIMONY OF SAMSUNG’S EXPERTS

vs.

13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
14 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
15 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19

On May 17, 2012, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) filed a Motion to Exclude Testimony of

20 Samsung’s Experts (Dkt. 940).
21

Samsung filed its Opposition to this motion on May 31, 2012.

Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and having

22 found no good cause therefor, the Court hereby DENIES Apple's Motion to Exclude Testimony of
23 Samsung’s Experts.
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4786252.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF SAMSUNG’S EXPERTS

-1-

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3 DATED:

______________________

4
5
6

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4786252.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING APPLE’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF SAMSUNG’S EXPERTS

-2-