Friedman v. Apple, Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER granting 12 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: AT&T Mobility, LLC answer due 4/1/2011; Apple, Inc. answer due 4/1/2011. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/25/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (lmt) (jrl).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AARON FRIEDMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. APPLE INC. a California Corporation; AT&T MOBILITY, LLC, a Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 3:10-cv-02403-JLS-POR ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO FURTHER EXTEND DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Judge: Hon. Janis L. Sammartino Complaint Filed: November 22, 2010 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Joint Motion To Further Extend Defendants’ Time To Respond To Complaint Case No. 3:10-cv-02403 sf-2960734 1 2 Good cause appearing, Plaintiff Aaron Friedman and Defendants Apple Inc. (“Apple”) 3 and AT&T Mobility, LLC’s (“ATTM”) Joint Motion to Further Extend Defendants’ Time to 4 Respond to Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) is GRANTED. Apple’s and ATTM’s 5 deadline to respond to the Complaint is April 1, 2011. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 9 Dated: February 25, 2011 ___________________________________ Janis L. Sammartino UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting Joint Motion To Further Extend Defendants’ Time To Respond To Complaint Case No. 3:10-cv-02403 sf-2960734 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?