Friedman v. Apple, Inc. et al
Filing
14
ORDER granting 12 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: AT&T Mobility, LLC answer due 4/1/2011; Apple, Inc. answer due 4/1/2011. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 2/25/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (lmt) (jrl).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
AARON FRIEDMAN, on behalf of himself and
all others similarly situated,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC. a California Corporation; AT&T
MOBILITY, LLC, a Delaware Corporation, and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Case No.
3:10-cv-02403-JLS-POR
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
MOTION TO FURTHER EXTEND
DEFENDANTS’ TIME TO
RESPOND TO CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT
Judge: Hon. Janis L. Sammartino
Complaint Filed: November 22, 2010
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Joint Motion To Further Extend Defendants’ Time To Respond To Complaint
Case No. 3:10-cv-02403
sf-2960734
1
2
Good cause appearing, Plaintiff Aaron Friedman and Defendants Apple Inc. (“Apple”)
3
and AT&T Mobility, LLC’s (“ATTM”) Joint Motion to Further Extend Defendants’ Time to
4
Respond to Class Action Complaint (“Complaint”) is GRANTED. Apple’s and ATTM’s
5
deadline to respond to the Complaint is April 1, 2011.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
9
Dated: February 25, 2011
___________________________________
Janis L. Sammartino
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Joint Motion To Further Extend Defendants’ Time To Respond To Complaint
Case No. 3:10-cv-02403
sf-2960734
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?