APEX Advance Holdings Limited v. Rivkin et al

Filing 12

ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A "CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE," OR ELSE A "DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT." Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 3, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APEX ADVANCE HOLDINGS LTD., 12 13 14 15 16 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) VLADIMIR RIVKIN, EFIM RIVKIN, ET ) AL., ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) Case No.: C 11-02051 PSG ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A “CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE,” OR ELSE A “DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT” 17 18 On May 3, 2011, Defendants Vladimir Rivkin and Efim Rivkin moved to dismiss. This case 19 has been assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge. Before the court takes any further action in 20 the case, the court must determine whether or not all of the parties who have appeared consent to 21 magistrate judge jurisdiction by the undersigned, or whether any of the parties request reassignment 22 to a district judge. Therefore, 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than May 13, 2011, each party shall file either a 24 “Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or else a “Declination to Proceed 25 Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment.” Both forms are available 26 from the Clerk of the Court, or from the Forms (Civil) section of the court’s website at 27 28 ORDER, page 1 1 www.cand.uscourts.gov. 2 Dated: 3 May 3, 2011 PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER, page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?