APEX Advance Holdings Limited v. Rivkin et al
Filing
12
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A "CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE," OR ELSE A "DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT." Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 3, 2011. (psglc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APEX ADVANCE HOLDINGS LTD.,
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
VLADIMIR RIVKIN, EFIM RIVKIN, ET )
AL.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________ )
Case No.: C 11-02051 PSG
ORDER SETTING DEADLINE FOR PARTIES
TO FILE EITHER A “CONSENT TO
PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE,” OR ELSE A
“DECLINATION TO PROCEED BEFORE A
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT”
17
18
On May 3, 2011, Defendants Vladimir Rivkin and Efim Rivkin moved to dismiss. This case
19
has been assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge. Before the court takes any further action in
20
the case, the court must determine whether or not all of the parties who have appeared consent to
21
magistrate judge jurisdiction by the undersigned, or whether any of the parties request reassignment
22
to a district judge. Therefore,
23
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than May 13, 2011, each party shall file either a
24
“Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge,” or else a “Declination to Proceed
25
Before a United States Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment.” Both forms are available
26
from the Clerk of the Court, or from the Forms (Civil) section of the court’s website at
27
28
ORDER, page 1
1
www.cand.uscourts.gov.
2
Dated:
3
May 3, 2011
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER, page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?