Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
12
STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer Complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc.. (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 5/17/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
12 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
13 Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, a
Korean corporation, and SAMSUNG
20 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
21
Plaintiffs,
22
vs.
23
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
24
Defendant.
25
CASE NO. 11-cv-02079-EDL
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
[Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2]
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte
Complaint Filed: April 27, 2011
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-02079-EDL
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
1
2
STIPULATION
Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
3 and Defendant Apple Inc., pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1 and 6-2, hereby respectfully inform
4 the Court of the parties’ agreement to extend the deadline for Defendant’s answer to Plaintiffs’
5 Complaint. The parties now AGREE AND STIPULATE to extend the deadline for Defendant to
6 answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by forty-five days, from May 19, 2011 to July 5,
7 2011.
8 1.
Reason for Extension of Time
9
At the request of Defendant, the parties have met and conferred and jointly agree to the
10 requested extension.
11 2.
Prior Time Modifications
12
There have been no previous time modifications in this case.
13 3.
Effect of Modification
14
The requested extension will have no effect on the rest of the schedule in this action. The
15 change will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
16 4.
No Waiver; Limited Application
17
This extension of time shall not be construed or used to support a contention that Plaintiffs
18 have waived any rights asserted, or contradicted any allegations made, in their complaint. This
19 extension of time for Defendant to file its answer or other responsive pleading also does not
20 relieve Defendant from participating in proceedings instituted in this action prior to the filing of
21 Defendant’s answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiffs’ complaint.
22
So stipulated.
23
24
25
26
27
28
03498.51845/4143999.1
Case No. 3:11-cv-02079
-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
1 DATED: May 17, 2011
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
2
3
By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
4
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America,
LLC
7
8
9 DATED: May 17, 2011
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
AND DORR LLP
10
11
By /s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn
12
Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
13
14
15
16
I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used
17
to file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that counsel for
18
Defendant has concurred in this filing.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
03498.51845/4143999.1
Case No. 3:11-cv-02079
-3STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO ANSWER COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?