Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 14

NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal and Intent to Pursue Patent Infringement Claims as Counterclaims in the Apple Action by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151) 2 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com 6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com th 7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 8 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 9 Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417) 10 michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor 11 Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 12 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, 14 LLC 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 18 Korean corporation, and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 19 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs, 20 vs. 21 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 22 Defendant. 23 CASE NO. 11-cv-02079-LHK PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO PURSUE PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS AS COUNTERCLAIMS IN THE APPLE ACTION 24 25 26 27 28 03498.51845/4230324.1 Case No. 11-cv-02079-LHK PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE 1 WHEREAS, on May 23, 2011, the Court granted Samsung’s motion and ordered this 2 action related to Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (N.D. 3 Cal.), a pending action brought by Apple Inc. (“Apple”) against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 4 Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (the 5 “Samsung entities”) in this district (the “Apple action”) (D.N. 13); 6 WHEREAS, concurrently with the filing of this Notice, the Samsung entities are filing in 7 the Apple Action their Answer and Counterclaims, which Counterclaims include patent 8 infringement claims asserted in this action; 9 WHEREAS, during the June 17, 2011 hearing in the Apple Action, the Court suggested 10 that an appropriate course of action would be for the Samsung entities to raise patent infringement 11 claims in the Apple Action, which would render this separate action unnecessary since the 12 Samsung entities could pursue their patent infringement claims in the Apple Action; and 13 WHEREAS, it would be in the interest of judicial and administrative efficiency for 14 Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC to 15 dismiss without prejudice their complaint for patent infringement in this case and instead pursue 16 those claims for patent infringement as Counterclaims in the Apple Action; 17 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications 19 America, LLC hereby notice a voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, of their complaint in this 20 case and instead will pursue their claims for patent infringement as Counterclaims in the Apple 21 Action. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 03498.51845/4230324.1 -1- Case No. 11-cv-02079-LHK PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE 1 DATED: June 30, 2011 2 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 3 4 5 6 7 8 By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis Charles K. Verhoeven Kevin P.B. Johnson Victoria F. Maroulis Michael T. Zeller Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 03498.51845/4230324.1 -2- Case No. 11-cv-02079-LHK PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?