Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
14
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal and Intent to Pursue Patent Infringement Claims as Counterclaims in the Apple Action by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 6/30/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
12 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America,
14 LLC
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
18 Korean corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
19 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
20
vs.
21
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
22
Defendant.
23
CASE NO. 11-cv-02079-LHK
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE PURSUANT TO
FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) AND
NOTICE OF INTENT TO PURSUE
PATENT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS AS
COUNTERCLAIMS IN THE APPLE
ACTION
24
25
26
27
28
03498.51845/4230324.1
Case No. 11-cv-02079-LHK
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE
1
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2011, the Court granted Samsung’s motion and ordered this
2 action related to Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (N.D.
3 Cal.), a pending action brought by Apple Inc. (“Apple”) against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
4 Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (the
5 “Samsung entities”) in this district (the “Apple action”) (D.N. 13);
6
WHEREAS, concurrently with the filing of this Notice, the Samsung entities are filing in
7 the Apple Action their Answer and Counterclaims, which Counterclaims include patent
8 infringement claims asserted in this action;
9
WHEREAS, during the June 17, 2011 hearing in the Apple Action, the Court suggested
10 that an appropriate course of action would be for the Samsung entities to raise patent infringement
11 claims in the Apple Action, which would render this separate action unnecessary since the
12 Samsung entities could pursue their patent infringement claims in the Apple Action; and
13
WHEREAS, it would be in the interest of judicial and administrative efficiency for
14 Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC to
15 dismiss without prejudice their complaint for patent infringement in this case and instead pursue
16 those claims for patent infringement as Counterclaims in the Apple Action;
17
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
18 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications
19 America, LLC hereby notice a voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, of their complaint in this
20 case and instead will pursue their claims for patent infringement as Counterclaims in the Apple
21 Action.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
03498.51845/4230324.1
-1-
Case No. 11-cv-02079-LHK
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE
1 DATED: June 30, 2011
2
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
3
4
5
6
7
8
By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
03498.51845/4230324.1
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-02079-LHK
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?