Flores v. OCB Restaurant Company, LLC

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER Continuing Initial Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 9/27/2011. Case Management Conference set for 10/4/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/26/2011. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2011)

** E-filed August 31, 2011**

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

WILLIAM L. MARDER, ESQ. (CBN 170131)
Polaris Law Group LLP.
501 San Benito Street, Suite 200
Hollister, CA 95023
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
HECTOR FLORES
MARY E. WRIGHT, State Bar No. 142886
[e-mail]
GREGORY C. CHENG, State Bar No. 226865
[e-mail]
JILL V. CARTWRIGHT, State Bar No. 260519
[e-mail]
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Steuart Tower, Suite 1300
One Market Plaza
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
415.442.4810
Facsimile:
415.442.4870
Attorneys for Defendant
OCB RESTAURANT COMPANY, LLC

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN JOSE DIVISION

18
19

HECTOR FLORES,
Plaintiff,

20
21
22

Case No. 5:11-CV-02091-HRL

vs.
OCB RESTAURANT COMPANY, LLC., and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Action Filed: March 24, 2011
Trial Date:
None Set

23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:11-CV-02091-HRL

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

STIPULATION

2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff Hector

3

Flores (“Plaintiff”) and his attorney of record Polaris Law Group, LLP, by William L. Marder,

4

and Defendant OCB Restaurant Company, LLC (“Defendant”), by its attorneys of record

5

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., by Gregory C. Cheng, that the following

6

Stipulation may be entered as an Order by the Court to give effect to the stipulations set forth

7

below:

8
9

1.

WHEREAS, the current initial case management conference has been scheduled

for September 27, 2011;

10

2.

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant, Gregory C. Cheng, has a mediation

11

scheduled for September 27, 2011, in the case Swanson v. GMR Marketing, LLC, et al., Contra

12

Costa Superior Court Case No. MSC 11-00261 (“Swanson”);

13

3.

WHEREAS, the Swanson mediation is scheduled and will take the full day on

14

September, 27, 2011. Because the required deposit has been paid and travel arrangements have

15

been made by all parties in the Swanson mediation, counsel for Defendant is unable to

16

reschedule the mediation;

17

4.

WHEREAS, the next available date for both parties to attend the initial case

18

management conference is on October 4, 2011, or any date thereafter (except October 18 or 25,

19

2011); and

20

5.

WHEREAS, good cause exists to continue the initial case management

21

conference to October 4, 2011, or a date thereafter convenient for the Court.

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 5:11-CV-02091-HRL

1

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record AGREE

2

AND HEREBY STIPULATE for an Order continuing the initial case management conference

3

from September 27, 2011 to October 4, 2011, or any date thereafter convenient for the Court

4

(except October 18 or 25, 2011).

5
6

DATED: August 25, 2011

POLARIS LAW GROUP

7
8
By:
/s/ _______________________
WILLIAM L. MARDER
Attorney for Plaintiff HECTOR FLORES

9
10
11

DATED: August 25, 2011

12

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.

13
14

By:
/s/ ________________________
MARY E. WRIGHT
GREGORY C. CHENG
JILL V. CARTWRIGHT
Attorneys for Defendant OCB RESTAURANT
COMPANY, LLC

15
16
17
18
19

ORDER
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the

20
initial case management conference is continued from September 27, 2011 to
21

October 4
_________________________, 2011.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

DATED:

8/26/2011

By:
Honorable Howard R. Lloyd
United States Magistrate Court Judge

26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Case No. 5:11-CV-02091-HRL