Lerma v. Jackson LTC Pharmacy et al
Filing
20
JOINT REQUEST TO VACATE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER, granting #18 Proposed Order filed by Anthony Lerma. 1/10/2012 Case Management Conference Vacated. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 12/29/2011. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
K. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone: (408) 298-2000
Facsimile: (408) 298-6046
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Anthony Lerma
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
ANTHONY LERMA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
JACKSON LTC PHARMACY, INC. dba
)
JACKSON MEDICAL PHARMACY, LORA )
L. PORTER, TRUSTEE OF THE LORA L. )
)
PORTER REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST OF )
1997,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
No. 5:11-CV-02160-PSG
JOINT REQUEST TO VACATE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference in this matter is currently set for
January 10, 2012;
22
WHEREAS, the Parties conducted joint site inspections within the time required by
23
this Court’s Scheduling Order and subsequent Stipulation and Order of the Court continuing
24
the date for the joint site inspection to take place to September 23, 2011;
25
WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Need for Mediation on November 10, 2011;
26
WHEREAS, no mediator has as yet been appointed in this matter. Plaintiff has been
27
informed on other matters that the ADR Unit is experiencing a backlog and attendant delay in
28
the appointment of mediators;
REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Anthony Lerma (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Jackson LTC
2
Pharmacy Inc. dba Jackson Medical Pharmacy, and Lora L. Porter, Trustee of the Lora L.
3
Porter Revocable Living Trust of 1997 (“Defendants” and, together with Plaintiff, the
4
“Parties”) believe that both Court resources and attorney time and costs will be most
5
effectively utilized if the Parties are given an opportunity to settle this matter through
6
mediation prior to attending and preparing for a case management conference;
7
WHEREAS, General Order 56, Paragraph 7 provides that if the matter does not settle
8
at mediation, Plaintiff is required to file a request for administrative relief requesting a case
9
management conference;
10
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the Court vacate the Case
11
Management Conference in order to afford the Parties the opportunity to reach a settlement
12
through mediation, and to permit Plaintiff to file a request for administrative relief requesting a
13
case management conference if necessary should the matter not settle at mediation.
14
Dated: December 21, 2011
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
15
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorneys for Plaintiff Anthony Lerma
16
17
18
Dated: December 21, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS O’HAGAN
19
20
/s/ Kelli E. George
Kelli E. George, Attorneys for Defendant
Jackson LTC Pharmacy Inc. dba
Jackson Medical Pharmacy
21
22
23
24
Dated: December 21, 2011
MEZZETTI LAW FIRM, INC.
25
26
/s/ Robert L. Mezzetti, II
Robert L. Mezzetti, II, Attorneys for
Lora L. Porter, Trustee of the Lora L.
Porter Revocable Living Trust of 1997
27
28
REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
2
1
ORDER
2
Upon request of the parties and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case management conference currently set for
4
January 10, 2012 is vacated. Plaintiff is ordered to file a request for administrative relief
5
requesting a case management conference within seven (7) days after the mediator files a
6
certification of mediation stating that the matter has not resolved, if in fact the matter does not
7
resolve at mediation.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated:
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?