Ortega v. Griggs & Associates, LLC et al

Filing 24

ORDER VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE re 22 Status Report filed by Stacey Ortega. The court finds a status conference is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for 1/13/2012, is VAC ATED, and Plaintiff ordered to comply with the following schedule: Deadline for Filing Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judge due by 2/3/2012. Motion Hearing re Default Judgment set for 4/6/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose befor e Hon. Edward J. Davila. The request of Plaintiff's counsel to appear by telephone (Docket Item No. 23) is DENIEDAS MOOT. Motions terminated: 23 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by Stacey Ortega. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/10/12. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:11-cv-02235 EJD STACEY ORTEGA, 11 ORDER VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. GRIGGS & ASSOCIATES LLC., et. al., 14 [Docket Item No. 23] Defendant(s). 15 / 16 Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Status Report (see Docket Item No. 22), the court finds a status 17 conference is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for January 13, 2012, is 18 VACATED, and Plaintiff ordered to comply with the following schedule: 19 Deadline for Filing Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment: 20 Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment: 21 The request of Plaintiff’s counsel to appear by telephone (Docket Item No. 23) is DENIED 22 10:00 a.m. on April 6, 2012 AS MOOT. 23 February 3, 2012 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: January 10, 2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:11-cv-02235 EJD ORDER VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?