Ortega v. Griggs & Associates, LLC et al
Filing
24
ORDER VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE re 22 Status Report filed by Stacey Ortega. The court finds a status conference is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for 1/13/2012, is VAC ATED, and Plaintiff ordered to comply with the following schedule: Deadline for Filing Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judge due by 2/3/2012. Motion Hearing re Default Judgment set for 4/6/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose befor e Hon. Edward J. Davila. The request of Plaintiff's counsel to appear by telephone (Docket Item No. 23) is DENIEDAS MOOT. Motions terminated: 23 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by Stacey Ortega. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/10/12. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-02235 EJD
STACEY ORTEGA,
11
ORDER VACATING STATUS
CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT
MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE
Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
v.
GRIGGS & ASSOCIATES LLC., et. al.,
14
[Docket Item No. 23]
Defendant(s).
15
/
16
Having reviewed Plaintiff’s Status Report (see Docket Item No. 22), the court finds a status
17
conference is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for January 13, 2012, is
18
VACATED, and Plaintiff ordered to comply with the following schedule:
19
Deadline for Filing Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment:
20
Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment:
21
The request of Plaintiff’s counsel to appear by telephone (Docket Item No. 23) is DENIED
22
10:00 a.m. on April 6, 2012
AS MOOT.
23
February 3, 2012
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: January 10, 2012
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:11-cv-02235 EJD
ORDER VACATING STATUS CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?