Crescini v. Standard Insurance Company

Filing 16

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Dismissal with Prejudice of Entire Action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) re 15 Stipulation,. The Clerk shall close this file. ***All Deadlines/Hearings terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/6/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 WARREN H. NELSON, JR. #104744 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 6161 El Cajon Boulevard, # 273 San Diego, CA 92115 Telephone: (619) 269 4212 Facsimile: (619) 501 7948 Attorney for Defendant STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 19 ) Case No.: CV 11-02328 EJD ) ) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ) ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH Plaintiff, ) PREJUDICE OF ENTIRE ACTION ) v. ) No hearing set or required. ) ) STANDARD INSURANCE ) ) COMPANY, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) Counsel for the parties, Plaintiff Lorelei Crescini and Defendant Standard 20 Insurance Company (“Standard”), jointly and respectfully submit this Stipulation 21 and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice of this entire action, following settlement 22 of this matter on terms that are confidential. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 23 LORELEI CRESCINI, More specifically, each and all of the parties hereto, by and through their 24 respective undersigned counsel, stipulate to the dismissal of this entire action with 25 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), each party to 26 bear her or its own costs, expenses and attorney fees. The parties further stipulate 27 that this Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of 28 STIP/ORDER TO DIMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE – CV 11-02328 EJD - 1 1 the settlement of this matter. The parties add that there is no dispute currently and 2 none is anticipated. 3 Local Civil Rule 7-12, Stipulations, provides: 4 Every stipulation requesting judicial action must be in writing signed by all 5 affected parties or their counsel. A proposed form of order may be submitted 6 with the stipulation and may consist of an endorsement on the stipulation of 7 the words, “PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,” with 8 spaces designated for the date and the signature of the Judge. 9 -- 10 -- 11 -- 12 -- 13 -- 14 -- 15 -- 16 -- 17 -- 18 -- 19 -- 20 -- 21 -- 22 -- 23 -- 24 -- 25 -- 26 -- 27 -- 28 -- STIP/ORDER TO DIMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE – CV 11-02328 EJD - 2 1 Pursuant to their settlement and the terms of Local Rule 7-12, the parties 2 respectfully request that the Court enter the Order that follows. 3 So Stipulated: 4 Dated: September 29, 2011 5 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff LORELEI CRESCINI 10 11 Dated: September 29, 2011 12 13 14 15 16 s/Warren H. Nelson, Jr. WARREN H. NELSON, JR. 104744 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 6161 El Cajon Boulevard, # 273 San Diego, CA 92115 Telephone: (619) 269 4212 Facsimile: (619) 501 7948 Email: nelson@rolando.sdcoxmail.com Attorney for Defendant STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 17 18 19 s/Constantin V. Roboostoff CONSTANTIN V. ROBOOSTOFF 69328 ROBOOSTOFF & KALKIN A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION 369 Pine Street, Suite 820 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 732 0282 Facsimile: (415) 732 0287 Email: cvr1@earthlink.net Pursuant to General Order No. 45 § XB, I, Warren H. Nelson, Jr., the e filer 20 of this document, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 21 obtained from the other signatory shown above, Constantin V. Roboostoff, Esq, 22 who is a registered “e filer” with this Court. 23 Dated: September 29, 2011 25 s/Warren H. Nelson, Jr. WARREN H. NELSON, JR. # 104744 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall close this file. 26 Dated: October __, 2011 6 24 27 28 _____________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT STIP/ORDER TO DIMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE – CV 11-02328 EJD - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?