Lofton v. Dollar Tree, Inc. et al
Filing
20
ORDER Vacating 16 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/22/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
SYDRIAN LOFTON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
DOLLAR TREE INC., MARDESICH
)
COMPANY SOUTHGATE, LLC, a California )
Limited Liability Company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 11-CV-02348-LHK
ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE HEARING
17
The Complaint in this case was filed on May 12, 2011. Because the Complaint asserts
18
violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., General
19
Order 56 applies. Under General Order 56, the Court set a schedule with deadlines for certain
20
events. See ECF No. 4. On October 5, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice of need for mediation between
21
Plaintiff and remaining Defendant Mardesich Company Southgate, LLC. ECF No. 13. The case
22
was automatically referred to court-sponsored mediation on October 7, 2011. See ECF Nos. 13-14;
23
General Order 56 (“The matter will then be automatically referred to mediation and the ADR
24
Program will schedule a mediation as soon as possible.”). On November 1, 2011, a mediator was
25
appointed. ECF No. 14. Because the Court had not heard from either party regarding the status of
26
mediation, despite the presumptive 90 day deadline pursuant to Local ADR Rule 6-4(b), the Court
27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-02348-LHK
ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE HEARING
1
issued an Order to Show Cause Why the Case Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure to Prosecute
2
on March 12, 2012. See ECF No. 16.
3
The attorneys in this case filed responses to the Order to Show Cause indicating that they
had diligently been pursuing mediation, but that the existence of a potentially related case had
5
complicated the process. See ECF Nos. 18-19. In light of these facts the Court VACATES the
6
Order to Show Cause Hearing, currently set for April 12, 2012. However, pursuant to General
7
Order 56, upon completion of the mediation, the parties are required to either inform the Court
8
whether mediation was successful or, if not, request a case management conference.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
4
Dated: March 22, 2012
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-02348-LHK
ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE HEARING
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?