Amador v. City Of San Jose et al
Filing
36
ORDER Vacating Motion Hearing, Final Pretrial Conference and Trial. Plaintiff's motion to amend complaint deemed submitted on the papers. 10/9/2012 motion hearing vacated. Final pretrial conference and trial dates vacated pending resolution of parties' motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/5/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2012)
1
2
*E-FILED: October 5, 2012*
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
12
13
14
15
16
No. C11-02374 HRL
HENRY STEVEN AMADOR,
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING, FINAL PRETRIAL
CONFERENCE AND TRIAL
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE; CHIEF OF POLICE
CHRIS MOORE; SARGENT DAVID MOODY
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
/
17
18
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 31) is deemed
19
suitable for determination without oral argument, and the October 9, 2012 motion hearing is
20
vacated. CIV. L.R. 7-1(b). Additionally, the currently scheduled final pretrial conference and
21
trial dates are vacated pending resolution of the parties’ pending motions.
22
Dated: October 5, 2012
23
HOWARD R. LLOYD
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
5:11-cv-02374-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Carlo L Miranda
3
George G. Benetatos
4
John Gregory Downing
5
Luan Thien Le
6
Richard D. North
7
Shannon Smyth-Mendoza cao.main@sanjoseca.gov,
shannon.smyth-mendoza@sanjoseca.gov
cmiranda106@gmail.com
BenetatosLaw@gmail.com
john@downinglaw.com
llesf@aol.com
cao.main@sanjoseca.gov, richard.north@sanjoseca.gov
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?