Amador v. City Of San Jose et al

Filing 36

ORDER Vacating Motion Hearing, Final Pretrial Conference and Trial. Plaintiff's motion to amend complaint deemed submitted on the papers. 10/9/2012 motion hearing vacated. Final pretrial conference and trial dates vacated pending resolution of parties' motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/5/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 *E-FILED: October 5, 2012* 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 12 13 14 15 16 No. C11-02374 HRL HENRY STEVEN AMADOR, ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING, FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE; CHIEF OF POLICE CHRIS MOORE; SARGENT DAVID MOODY and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. / 17 18 Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. No. 31) is deemed 19 suitable for determination without oral argument, and the October 9, 2012 motion hearing is 20 vacated. CIV. L.R. 7-1(b). Additionally, the currently scheduled final pretrial conference and 21 trial dates are vacated pending resolution of the parties’ pending motions. 22 Dated: October 5, 2012 23 HOWARD R. LLOYD 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 5:11-cv-02374-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Carlo L Miranda 3 George G. Benetatos 4 John Gregory Downing 5 Luan Thien Le 6 Richard D. North 7 Shannon Smyth-Mendoza cao.main@sanjoseca.gov, shannon.smyth-mendoza@sanjoseca.gov cmiranda106@gmail.com BenetatosLaw@gmail.com john@downinglaw.com llesf@aol.com cao.main@sanjoseca.gov, richard.north@sanjoseca.gov 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?