Rose v. Bank of America Corporation

Filing 55

ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER REQUIRING APPEARANCE AT STATUS CONFERENCE. One attorney on behalf of each party in each case must appear personally. The court does not require the personal appearance of all counsel for each party. Counsel shall be prepare d to:(1) explain why a Motion for Preliminary Approval has not yet been filed despite the courts instructions, on several occasions, that one be filed;(2) propose a final deadline for the filing of a Motion for Preliminary Approval in no less than 30 days from the date of the conference, which if not met, will result in these actions either being dismissed or restored to court's active case calendar on an expedited case schedule determined solely by the court. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/12/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NOS. 5:11-cv-02390 EJD;
5:11-cv-04009 EJD

STEPHENIE ROSE, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated;

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER
REQUIRING APPEARANCE AT STATUS
CONFERENCE

Plaintiff(s),
v.

13
14

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et.
al.,

15
Defendant(s).
16

/

17

CAROL DUKE, et. al., on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated;

18
19

Plaintiff(s),
v.

20
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et. al.,
21
22

Defendant(s).
/

23
24

With respect to the order requiring counsel’s appearance at the status conference scheduled

25

for September 13, 2013 (see Docket Item No. 53 in 5:11-cv-02390 EJD; Docket Item No. 39 in

26

5:12-cv-04009 EJD), the court clarifies that one attorney on behalf of each party in each case must

27

appear personally. The court does not require the personal appearance of all counsel for each party.

28
1
CASE NOS. 5:11-cv-02390 EJD; 5:11-cv-04009 EJD
ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER REQUIRING APPEARANCE AT STATUS CONFERENCE

1

As to the status conference, counsel shall be prepared to:

2

(1) explain why a Motion for Preliminary Approval has not yet been filed despite the court’s

3
4

instructions, on several occasions, that one be filed;
(2) propose a final deadline for the filing of a Motion for Preliminary Approval in no less

5

than 30 days from the date of the conference, which if not met, will result in these actions either

6

being dismissed or restored to court’s active case calendar on an expedited case schedule determined

7

solely by the court.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
Dated: September 12, 2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NOS. 5:11-cv-02390 EJD; 5:11-cv-04009 EJD
ORDER CLARIFYING ORDER REQUIRING APPEARANCE AT STATUS CONFERENCE