Kennedy v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, District Director

Filing 18

ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH PROCEDURAL ORDER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MANDAMUS CASES. The Court Orders as follows: 1) The Federal Defendant shall, no later than November 15, 2011, file and serve an Answer as required by the Procedural Order. 2) The F ederal Defendant shall convert the "Notice of Respondents Opposition" into a Motion for Summary Judgment which complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and shall file and serve such motion no later than November 15, 2011. 3) After the filing of the documents described above, the parties shall then comply with the Procedural Order in all further aspects. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/1/2011. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2011) Modified text on 11/1/2011 (ecg, COURT STAFF). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/1/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RICHARD KENNEDY, Case Number: CV11-02407 EJD Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, DISTRICT DIRECTOR et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on November 1, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Richard Kennedy 1442 McQuesten Drive #A San Jose, CA 95122 Dated: November 1, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk /s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?