Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 54

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Boyd, Kathryn) (Filed on 8/5/2011)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Doe I, Doe II, Ivy He, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V, Doe VI, Roe VII, Charles Lee, Roe VIII, Liu Guifu, and those individuals similarly situated, Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF Plaintiff(s), ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL v. Cisco Systems, Inc., John Chambers, Thomas Lam, Owen Chan, and Does 1-100, Defendant(s). / Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has: (1) Read the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California” on the Court’s ADR Internet site www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov (Limited printed copies are available from the clerk’s office for parties in cases not subject to the court’s Electronic Case Filing program (ECF) under General Order 45); (2) Discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities; and (3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution options. Dated: 08-05-2011 /s/ Ivy He, /s/ Liu Guifu and /s/ Charles Lee on behalf of Plaintiffs [Party] Dated: 08-05-2011 /s/ K. Lee Boyd [Counsel] When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the ADR Docket Event entitled "ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5b) of Discussion of ADR Options." Rev. 12/05

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?