Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
54
ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Boyd, Kathryn) (Filed on 8/5/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Doe I, Doe II, Ivy He, Doe III, Doe IV,
Doe V, Doe VI, Roe VII, Charles Lee, Roe VIII,
Liu Guifu, and those individuals similarly
situated,
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-JF
Plaintiff(s),
ADR CERTIFICATION BY
PARTIES AND COUNSEL
v.
Cisco Systems, Inc., John Chambers,
Thomas Lam, Owen Chan,
and Does 1-100,
Defendant(s).
/
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies
that he or she has:
(1) Read the handbook entitled “Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District
of California” on the Court’s ADR Internet site www.adr.cand.uscourts.gov (Limited printed
copies are available from the clerk’s office for parties in cases not subject to the court’s
Electronic Case Filing program (ECF) under General Order 45);
(2) Discussed the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private
entities; and
(3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute
resolution options.
Dated: 08-05-2011
/s/ Ivy He, /s/ Liu Guifu and
/s/ Charles Lee on behalf of
Plaintiffs
[Party]
Dated: 08-05-2011
/s/ K. Lee Boyd
[Counsel]
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the ADR Docket Event entitled
"ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5b) of Discussion of ADR Options."
Rev. 12/05
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?