Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
72
STIPULATION RE: SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON NEWLY ADDED DEFENDANT FREDY CHEUNG by Doe I, Doe II, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V, Doe VI, Liu Guifu, Ivy He, Charles Lee, Roe VII, Roe VIII. (Boyd, Kathryn) (Filed on 10/10/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
KATHRYN LEE CRAWFORD-BOYD, ESQ. (SBN 189496)
lboyd@srbr-law.com
RAJIKA L. SHAH, ESQ. (SBN 232994)
rshah@srbr-law.com
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 360
Los Angeles, California 90048
Phone: (323) 302-9488, Fax: (323) 931-4990
TERRI MARSH, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
terri.marsh@hrlf.net
BRIAN PIERCE, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
brianp@hrlf.net
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOUNDATION
1615 L Street NW, Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 369-4977, Fax: (323) 931-4990
JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY (pro hac vice)
jchomsky@igc.org
LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY
8210 New Second Street
Elkins Park, PA 19027
Phone: (215) 782-8327, Fax: (215)782-8368
Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS
14
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSG
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE IV,
DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE,
ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., John CHAMBERS,
Thomas LAM, Owen CHAN, Fredy
CHEUNG, and DOES 1-100,
Assigned to the Honorable Edward J. Davila
STIPULATION RE: SERVICE OF
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON
NEWLY ADDED DEFENDANT FREDY
CHEUNG
Complaint Filed: May 19, 2011
FAC Filed: September 2, 2011
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG,
BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048
STIPULATION RE: SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON NEWLY ADDED DEFENDANT FREDY CHEUNG
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSG
STIPULATION
1
2
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE
3
III, DOE IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE, ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu (“Plaintiffs”)
4
and Defendants CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (“Cisco”), John CHAMBERS (“Chambers”), Thomas
5
LAM (“Lam”), Owen CHAN (“Chan”), and Fredy CHEUNG (“Cheung”) (“Defendants”)
6
(collectively, the “Parties”), as follows:
7
WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B) and by stipulation, Plaintiffs filed a
8
Corrected First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on September 2, 2011, in which Plaintiffs named
9
Cheung as a new defendant, and notice was electronically delivered to counsel, via Electronic
10
Case Filing (“ECF”) (Docket Entry (“DE”) 62-1);
WHEREAS, by email dated September 9, 2011, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
11
12
LLP indicated that it was authorized to accept service of the Summons (“Summons”) and FAC on
13
Cheung;
WHEREAS, on September 23, 2011, the Summons was entered in the docket and notice
14
15
was electronically delivered to counsel via ECF (DE 66);
WHEREAS, Defendants, including Cheung, filed a Motion to Dismiss the FAC on
16
17
September 23, 2011;
18
NOW THEREFOR IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties,
19
through their respective counsel, subject to and in accordance with the recitations set forth above,
20
that:
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1.
Service of the Summons and FAC on Cheung is valid and effective as to Cheung
as of September 23, 2011.
2.
Defendants, including Cheung, do each hereby waive any and all defense(s) and
objection(s) to service of process on Cheung.
3.
Plaintiffs do each hereby acknowledge that the Motion to Dismiss filed by
Defendants on September 23, 2011, constitutes Cheung’s responsive pleading to the FAC.
4.
This Stipulation will constitute a valid Proof of Service on Cheung upon filing
with the Court.
-1-
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG,
BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048
STIPULATION RE: SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON NEWLY ADDED DEFENDANT FREDY CHEUNG
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSG
1
DATED: October 10, 2011
2
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD &
RADER, LLP
3
By:
4
5
DATED: October 10, 2011
/s/ K. Lee Boyd
K. Lee Boyd, Esq.
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOUNDATION
6
7
By: /s/ Terri E. Marsh
Terri E. Marsh, Esq. (pro hac vice)
8
9
DATED: October 10, 2011
LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY
10
By: /s/ Judith B. Chomsky
Judith B. Chomsky, Esq. (pro hac vice)
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
14
DATED: October 10, 2011
15
16
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
By:
17
/s/ Kathleen Sullivan
Kathleen Sullivan, Esq.1
Isaac Nesser, Esq.
18
Attorneys for Defendants
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG,
BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048
1
I have given my consent for Plaintiffs to electronically sign this Stipulation on my behalf.
-2STIPULATION RE: SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT ON NEWLY ADDED DEFENDANT FREDY CHEUNG
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?