Doe I et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
77
Proposed Order re 76 MOTION to Reschedule Briefing Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 7-11 by Doe I, Doe II, Doe III, Doe IV, Doe V, Doe VI, Liu Guifu, Ivy He, Charles Lee, Roe VII, Roe VIII. (Boyd, Kathryn) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
KATHRYN LEE CRAWFORD-BOYD, ESQ. (SBN 189496)
lboyd@srbr-law.com
RAJIKA L. SHAH, ESQ. (SBN 232994)
rshah@srbr-law.com
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG, BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 360
Los Angeles, California 90048
Phone: (323) 302-9488, Fax: (323) 931-4990
TERRI MARSH, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
terri.marsh@hrlf.net
BRIAN PIERCE, ESQ. (pro hac vice)
brianp@hrlf.net
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW FOUNDATION
1615 L Street NW, Suite 1100
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 369-4977, Fax: (323) 931-4990
12
JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY (pro hac vice)
jchomsky@igc.org
LAW OFFICES OF JUDITH BROWN CHOMSKY
8210 New Second Street
Elkins Park, PA 19027
Phone: (215) 782-8327, Fax: (215)782-8368
13
Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS
10
11
14
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
DOE I, DOE II, Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE
IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles
LEE, ROE VIII, and LIU Guifu, and
those individual similarly situated,
18
19
20
Plaintiffs,
23
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO
RESCHEDULE BRIEFING
[N.D.Cal. Local Rule 7-11]
Action Filed: May 19, 2011
FAC Filed: Sept. 2, 2011
vs.
21
22
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx
Assigned to the Hon. Edward J. Davila
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., John
CHAMBERS, Thomas LAM, Owen
CHAN, Fredy CHEUNG, and DOES 1100,
24
25
Defendants.
26
27
28
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG,
BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RESCHEDULE BRIEFING
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Upon the Motion to Reschedule Briefing submitted by Plaintiffs DOE I, DOE II,
2
3
Ivy HE, DOE III, DOE IV, DOE V, DOE VI, ROE VII, Charles LEE, ROE VIII, and LIU
4
Guifu (“Plaintiffs”), the Court, having considered the papers submitted, HEREBY
5
ORDERS THAT:
1.
6
Briefing on only the following three questions raised by the Motion to
7
Dismiss filed by Defendants CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (“Cisco”), John CHAMBERS
8
(“Chambers”), Thomas LAM (“Lam”), Owen CHAN (“Chan”), and Fredy CHEUNG
9
(“Cheung”) (“Defendants”) on September 23, 2011 (Docket Entry 67) (“Motion to
10
Dismiss”) will continue on the current briefing schedule established in the Court’s Order
11
dated October 11, 2011 (Docket Entry 74):1 (1) whether the case presents a non-justiciable
12
political question, (2) whether the complaint challenges an act of state, and (3) whether
13
the case violates principles of international comity.
2.
14
Briefing on all other issues raised by Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is
15
rescheduled until after the U.S. Supreme Court issues its decision in Kiobel v. Royal
16
Dutch Petroleum Co. and Mohamad v. Rajub, Nos. 10-1491 and 11-88, --- S.Ct. ----, 79
17
USLW 3728 (2011), cert. granted October 17, 2011.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
22
Dated: __________________
23
_____________
Hon. Edward J. Davila
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
1
28
SCHWARCZ, RIMBERG,
BOYD & RADER, LLP
6310 San Vicente Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Plaintiffs’ Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss is due November 18, 2011, while Defendants’
Reply is due January 16, 2012, with hearing scheduled for February 17, 2012.
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO RESCHEDULE BRIEFING
Case No. 5:11-cv-02449-EJD-PSGx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?