EIT Holdings, LLC v. Linkedin Corporation

Filing 20

NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) (Goldstein, Edward) (Filed on 8/18/2011)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Clear Form EIT HOLDINGS, LLC CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG Plaintiff(s), v. NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE LINKEDIN CORPORATION Defendant(s). ____________________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and that they: 9 9 have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process request an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge September 6, 2011 Date of Case Management Conference ___________________ The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference: Name Party Representing Edward W. Goldstein Plaintiff Phone No. 713-877-1515 E-Mail Address egoldstein@gliplaw.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Benedict O' Mahoney Plaintiff 408-299-1200 bomahoney@terra-law.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Kent Defendant 415-362-6666 rkent@durietangri.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Daralyn Durie Defendant 415-362-6666 ddurie@durietangri.com ___________________________________________________________________________ Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management Conference. The ADR Unit (adr@cand.uscourts.gov) will notify you of the date and time of your phone conference. 8/18/11 Dated:___________ 8/18/11 Dated:____________ Rev 12.05 /s/ Edward W. Goldstein ______________________ Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Ryan Kent ______________________ Attorney for Defendant When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the ADR Docket Event entitled "Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d)."

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?