EIT Holdings, LLC v. Linkedin Corporation
Filing
20
NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) (Goldstein, Edward) (Filed on 8/18/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Clear Form
EIT HOLDINGS, LLC
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG
Plaintiff(s),
v.
NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE
CONFERENCE
LINKEDIN CORPORATION
Defendant(s).
____________________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and that they:
9
9
have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process
request an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge
September 6, 2011
Date of Case Management Conference ___________________
The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference:
Name
Party Representing
Edward W. Goldstein
Plaintiff
Phone No.
713-877-1515
E-Mail Address
egoldstein@gliplaw.com
___________________________________________________________________________
Benedict O' Mahoney
Plaintiff
408-299-1200
bomahoney@terra-law.com
___________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Kent
Defendant
415-362-6666
rkent@durietangri.com
___________________________________________________________________________
Daralyn Durie
Defendant
415-362-6666
ddurie@durietangri.com
___________________________________________________________________________
Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a
telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management
Conference. The ADR Unit (adr@cand.uscourts.gov) will notify you of the date and time of your
phone conference.
8/18/11
Dated:___________
8/18/11
Dated:____________
Rev 12.05
/s/ Edward W. Goldstein
______________________
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Ryan Kent
______________________
Attorney for Defendant
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the ADR Docket Event entitled
"Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d)."
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?