EIT Holdings, LLC v. Linkedin Corporation
Filing
39
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL by Judge Paul S. Grewal, granting 38 Stipulation (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DURIE TANGRI LLP
DARALYN J DURIE (SBN 169825)
ddurie@durietangri.com
RYAN M. KENT (SBN 220441)
rkent@durietangri.com
EUGENE NOVIKOV (SBN 257849)
enovikov@durietangri.com
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-362-6666
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
Mark W. Good (State Bar No. 218809)
Benedict O’Mahoney (State Bar No. 152447)
TERRA LAW LLP
177 Park Avenue, Third Floor
San Jose, California 95113
Telephone: (408) 299-1200
Facsimile: (408) 998-4895
Email: mgood@terra-law.com
Email: bomahoney@terra-law.com
Attorneys for Defendant
and Counterclaim Plaintiff
LINKEDIN CORPORATION
Edward W. Goldstein (TX Bar No. 08099500)
Alisa Lipski (TX Bar No. 24041345)
Jody M. Goldstein (TX Bar No. 24002153)
Goldstein & Lipski, PLLC
1177 West Loop South, Suite 400
Houston, Texas 77027
Telephone: (713) 877-1515
Facsimile: (713) 877-1737
Email: egoldstein@gliplaw.com
Email: alipski@gliplaw.com
Email: jgoldstein@gliplaw.com
9
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EIT HOLDINGS LLC
14
15
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN JOSE DIVISION
19
EIT HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware company
20
21
22
23
24
Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,
v.
LINKEDIN CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation
Case No. 5:11-cv-02465-PSG
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL
Ctrm: 5, 4th Floor
Judge: Honorable Paul Singh Grewal
Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG
1
2
JOINT STIPULATION
On December 10, 2010, EIT filed a patent infringement action against multiple defendants in the
3
Northern District of California (C-10-05623-WHA) before the Honorable William H. Alsup. That action
4
alleged that each defendant infringed claims 40 and 41 of U.S. Patent No. 5,828,837. After the initial
5
case management conference, Judge Alsup held that the defendants, including LinkedIn Corporation
6
(“LinkedIn”), were improperly joined and dismissed all but the first-named defendant (Yelp! Inc.). EIT
7
thereafter filed this action against LinkedIn alleging infringement of the same claims.
8
At the initial case management conference in this action, the parties informed the Court that
9
Judge Alsup had set a claim construction hearing in the originally-filed Yelp case for early October 2011.
10
The parties accordingly asked the Court to continue the case management conference and to postpone
11
setting a schedule until Judge Alsup had had time to consider EIT and Yelp’s respective positions on what
12
the claims mean. The Court agreed and set another case management conference. At that subsequent
13
conference held on January 10, 2012, the parties explained the current proceedings before Judge Alsup,
14
including that Yelp had filed a motion for summary judgment of invalidity.
15
On January 20th, Judge Alsup issued an order on the summary judgment motion brought by Yelp,
16
holding that claims 40 and 41 are invalid. EIT already has filed a notice of appeal that indicates its intent
17
to appeal inter alia the summary judgment order entered in the Yelp case. If affirmed, however, there is
18
no dispute that that summary judgment order would completely resolve the case against LinkedIn
19
pending before this Court. The parties therefore respectfully request that the Court stay this case pending
20
the resolution of EIT’s appeal of the summary judgment order entered in EIT Holdings, LLC v. Yelp! Inc.,
21
case no. 3:10-cv-05623-WHA (N.D. Cal.).
22
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED THAT:
23
The undersigned parties agreed to stay this case, EIT Holdings, LLC v .LinkedIn Corporation,
24
case no. 5:11-cv-02465-PSG, until the fifth court day after EIT Holdings, LLC’s appeal of the summary
25
judgment order in EIT Holdings, LLC v. Yelp! Inc., case no. 3:10-cv-05623-WHA (N.D. Cal.) has been
26
finally adjudicated, which shall be the date on which the last appeal or certiorari petition with respect to
27
the summary judgment order has been denied, dismissed, withdrawn, or otherwise determined.
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG
1
Dated: January 25, 2012
GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, PLLC
2
/s/ Edward W. Goldstein
By:
3
EDWARD W. GOLDSTEIN
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant EIT Holdings, LLC
5
6
7
Dated: January 25, 2012
DURIE TANGRI LLP
/s/ Ryan M. Kent
8
By:
RYAN M. KENT
9
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff LinkedIn Corporation
10
11
12
13
14
FILER’S ATTESTATION
I, Ryan Kent, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this
15
document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
16
Defendant EIT Holdings, LLC has concurred in this filing.
/s/ Ryan M. Kent
17
RYAN M. KENT
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant EIT Holdings, LLC and Defendant and
3
Counterclaim Plaintiff LinkedIn Corporation have agreed to stay this case, EIT Holdings, LLC v.
4
LinkedIn Corporation, United States District Court, Northern District of California, case no. 5:11-cv-
5
02465-PSG until the fifth court day after EIT Holdings, LLC’s appeal of the summary judgment order in
6
EIT Holdings, LLC v. Yelp! Inc., case no. 3:10-cv-05623-WHA (N.D. Cal.) has been finally adjudicated,
7
which shall be the date on which the last appeal or certiorari petition with respect to the summary
8
judgment order has been denied, dismissed, withdrawn, or otherwise determined.
9
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
DATED:
, 2012
_________________________________
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?