EIT Holdings, LLC v. Linkedin Corporation

Filing 39

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL by Judge Paul S. Grewal, granting 38 Stipulation (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J DURIE (SBN 169825) ddurie@durietangri.com RYAN M. KENT (SBN 220441) rkent@durietangri.com EUGENE NOVIKOV (SBN 257849) enovikov@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 Mark W. Good (State Bar No. 218809) Benedict O’Mahoney (State Bar No. 152447) TERRA LAW LLP 177 Park Avenue, Third Floor San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 299-1200 Facsimile: (408) 998-4895 Email: mgood@terra-law.com Email: bomahoney@terra-law.com Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff LINKEDIN CORPORATION Edward W. Goldstein (TX Bar No. 08099500) Alisa Lipski (TX Bar No. 24041345) Jody M. Goldstein (TX Bar No. 24002153) Goldstein & Lipski, PLLC 1177 West Loop South, Suite 400 Houston, Texas 77027 Telephone: (713) 877-1515 Facsimile: (713) 877-1737 Email: egoldstein@gliplaw.com Email: alipski@gliplaw.com Email: jgoldstein@gliplaw.com 9 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff EIT HOLDINGS LLC 14 15 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN JOSE DIVISION 19 EIT HOLDINGS, LLC, a Delaware company 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant, v. LINKEDIN CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation Case No. 5:11-cv-02465-PSG JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL Ctrm: 5, 4th Floor Judge: Honorable Paul Singh Grewal Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG 1 2 JOINT STIPULATION On December 10, 2010, EIT filed a patent infringement action against multiple defendants in the 3 Northern District of California (C-10-05623-WHA) before the Honorable William H. Alsup. That action 4 alleged that each defendant infringed claims 40 and 41 of U.S. Patent No. 5,828,837. After the initial 5 case management conference, Judge Alsup held that the defendants, including LinkedIn Corporation 6 (“LinkedIn”), were improperly joined and dismissed all but the first-named defendant (Yelp! Inc.). EIT 7 thereafter filed this action against LinkedIn alleging infringement of the same claims. 8 At the initial case management conference in this action, the parties informed the Court that 9 Judge Alsup had set a claim construction hearing in the originally-filed Yelp case for early October 2011. 10 The parties accordingly asked the Court to continue the case management conference and to postpone 11 setting a schedule until Judge Alsup had had time to consider EIT and Yelp’s respective positions on what 12 the claims mean. The Court agreed and set another case management conference. At that subsequent 13 conference held on January 10, 2012, the parties explained the current proceedings before Judge Alsup, 14 including that Yelp had filed a motion for summary judgment of invalidity. 15 On January 20th, Judge Alsup issued an order on the summary judgment motion brought by Yelp, 16 holding that claims 40 and 41 are invalid. EIT already has filed a notice of appeal that indicates its intent 17 to appeal inter alia the summary judgment order entered in the Yelp case. If affirmed, however, there is 18 no dispute that that summary judgment order would completely resolve the case against LinkedIn 19 pending before this Court. The parties therefore respectfully request that the Court stay this case pending 20 the resolution of EIT’s appeal of the summary judgment order entered in EIT Holdings, LLC v. Yelp! Inc., 21 case no. 3:10-cv-05623-WHA (N.D. Cal.). 22 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED THAT: 23 The undersigned parties agreed to stay this case, EIT Holdings, LLC v .LinkedIn Corporation, 24 case no. 5:11-cv-02465-PSG, until the fifth court day after EIT Holdings, LLC’s appeal of the summary 25 judgment order in EIT Holdings, LLC v. Yelp! Inc., case no. 3:10-cv-05623-WHA (N.D. Cal.) has been 26 finally adjudicated, which shall be the date on which the last appeal or certiorari petition with respect to 27 the summary judgment order has been denied, dismissed, withdrawn, or otherwise determined. 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG 1 Dated: January 25, 2012 GOLDSTEIN & LIPSKI, PLLC 2 /s/ Edward W. Goldstein By: 3 EDWARD W. GOLDSTEIN 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant EIT Holdings, LLC 5 6 7 Dated: January 25, 2012 DURIE TANGRI LLP /s/ Ryan M. Kent 8 By: RYAN M. KENT 9 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff LinkedIn Corporation 10 11 12 13 14 FILER’S ATTESTATION I, Ryan Kent, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this 15 document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that counsel for Plaintiff and Counterclaim 16 Defendant EIT Holdings, LLC has concurred in this filing. /s/ Ryan M. Kent 17 RYAN M. KENT 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant EIT Holdings, LLC and Defendant and 3 Counterclaim Plaintiff LinkedIn Corporation have agreed to stay this case, EIT Holdings, LLC v. 4 LinkedIn Corporation, United States District Court, Northern District of California, case no. 5:11-cv- 5 02465-PSG until the fifth court day after EIT Holdings, LLC’s appeal of the summary judgment order in 6 EIT Holdings, LLC v. Yelp! Inc., case no. 3:10-cv-05623-WHA (N.D. Cal.) has been finally adjudicated, 7 which shall be the date on which the last appeal or certiorari petition with respect to the summary 8 judgment order has been denied, dismissed, withdrawn, or otherwise determined. 9 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 DATED: , 2012 _________________________________ HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPEAL CASE NO. 5:11-CV-02465-PSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?