Graifman v. Trend Micro Corporation

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER 49 Extending Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint and Discovery. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/10/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Timothy J. Burke (SBN 181866)
STULL, STULL & BRODY
10940 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2300
Los Angeles, CA 90024
[phone]
[phone]
[e-mail]
Gary S. Graifman
KANTROWITZ, GOLDHAMER &
GRAIFMAN, PC
210 Summit Ave.
Montvale, NJ 07645
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: 201-307-1086
Michael S. Green
GREEN & ASSOCIATES, LLC
522 Route 18
P.O. Box 428
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Facsimile: 732-390-0481

Tod L. Gamlen, State Bar No. 83458
Irene V. Gutierrez, State Bar No. 252927
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
660 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1044
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Mark D. Taylor (pro hac vice)
Matthew McCrary (pro hac vice)
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
2300 Trammell Crow Center
Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone:
214 978 3000
Facsimile:
214 978 3099
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
TREND MICRO, INC. (USA) sued herein as
TREND MICRO CORPORATION

Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRIAN GRAIFMAN

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19
20

SAN JOSE DIVISION
BRIAN GRAIFMAN, on Behalf of Himself, All
Others Similarly Situated, and the General
Public,

21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff,

Case No. CV11-02488 RMW
STIPULATION AND ORDER
[] EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY

v.
TREND MICRO CORPORATION, and DOES
1 through 10, Inclusive,

Complaint Filed: March 2, 2011

Defendants.

26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
660 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
[phone]

1
Case No. CV11-02488 RMW
STIPULATION AND ORDER [] EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY
PALDMS/454595.1

STIPULATION

1
2

Plaintiff BRIAN GRAIFMAN (including any and all other persons that he may be

3

determined to represent) (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant TREND MICRO INC. (USA)(“Trend Micro”),

4

by and through their respective counsel, enter into this Stipulation.

5

WHEREAS, on November 9, 2011 the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an Amended

6

Class Action Complaint (“FAC”) in this action (Dkt. No.48) and such FAC was deemed filed on

7

November 9, 2011.

8
9
10

WHEREAS, absent an extension of time and pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Regarding
Filing of Amended Class Action Complaint (Dkt. No. 46), Trend Micro is to respond to the FAC on
or before December 9, 2011.

11

WHEREAS, on November 10, 2011 Plaintiff served a revised First Request for Production of

12

Documents (“Plaintiff’s November 10 Document Request”) and a revised First Set of Interrogatories

13

(“Plaintiff’s November 10 Interrogatories”).

14

WHEREAS, absent an extension of time, Trend Micro is to respond to Plaintiff’s November

15

10 Document Request and Plaintiff’s November 10 Interrogatories on or before December 14, 2011.

16

WHEREAS, certain events have occurred which have led to Trend Micro needing additional

17

time in order to respond to the FAC, Plaintiff’s November 10 Document Request and Plaintiff’s

18

November 10 Interrogatories , including, but not limited to, extensive discussions as to the scope and

19

interpretation of Plaintiff’s November 10 Document Request and whether Plaintiff would be

20

amending the class definition set forth in ¶ 30 of the FAC.

21

WHEREAS, the Plaintiff is agreeable to granting Trend Micro the extensions set forth in ¶¶ 1

22

and 2 below to respond to the FAC, Plaintiff’s November 10 Document Request, and Plaintiff’s

23

November 10 Interrogatories but requests that the dates set forth in ¶ 1.a. – g., of the Court’s

24

September 30, 2011 Initial Case Management and Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 44)(“ September 30

25

Scheduling Order”) be extended by the the time set forth in ¶ 3; and, Trend Micro is agreeable to

26

such request.

27

//

28

//

Baker & McKenzie LLP
660 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
[phone]

2
Case No. CV11-02488 RMW
STIPULATION AND ORDER [] EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY
PALDMS/454595.1

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that:

1
1.

2
3

The time for Trend Micro to respond to the FAC is hereby extended up to and

including December 28, 2011.
2.

4

The time for Trend Micro to respond to the Plaintiff’s November 10 Document

5

Request and Plaintiff’s November 10 Interrogatories is hereby extended up to and including

6

December 28, 2011.
3.

7
8

The dates and deadlines for the class certification phase of this action and as set forth

in the September 30 Scheduling Order at ¶ 1.a.-g., are extended as follows:
a. Designation of Class Certification Experts – from December 30, 2011 to

9

January 13, 2012;

10

b. Designation of Rebuttal Class Certification Experts – from January 20, 2012

11

to February 3, 2012 ;

12

c. Close of Class Certification Discovery – from February 10, 2012 to February

13

24, 2012;

14

d. Filing of Class Certification motion –from February 28, 2012 to March 13,

15

2012;

16

e. Filing of Opposition to Class Certification motion – from March 29, 2012 to

17

April 12, 2012;

18

f. Filing of Reply to Class Certification motion – from April 30, 2012 to May 7,

19

2012;

20
21

//

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

//

26

//

27

//

28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
660 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
[phone]

3
Case No. CV11-02488 RMW
STIPULATION AND ORDER [PROPOSED] EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY
PALDMS/454595.1

g. Hearing on class certification motion – from May 18, 2012 to June 1, 2012.

1
2

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

3
4
5

Dated: December 9, 2011

BAKER & McKENZIE LLP

6
7

By:/s/ Tod L. Gamlen
Tod L. Gamlen
Attorneys for Defendant
TREND MICRO, INC. (USA) sued herein
as TREND MICRO, CORPORATION

8
9
10

Dated: December 9, 2011

STULL, STULL & BRODY

11
By: /s/ Timothy J. Burke
Timothy J. Burke
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRIAN GRAIFMAN

12
13
14
15

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE BY TOD L. GAMLEN

16

I, Tod L. Gamlen, hereby attest that I am one of the attorneys for Trend Micro Incorporated

17
18
19
20

(USA), and, as the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that, pursuant to General Order No.
45(X)(B), concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Timothy J. Burke, the
above signatory.

21
22

Dated: December 9, 2011

By: /s/ Tod L. Gamlen

23
ORDER []

24

Pursuant to stipulation IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated:

, 201
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
660 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
[phone]

4
Case No. CV11-02488 RMW
STIPULATION AND ORDER [] EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY
PALDMS/454595.1