Graifman v. Trend Micro Corporation

Filing 92

ORDER Certifying Settlement Class and Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/15/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 BRIAN GRAIFMAN, on Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated, and the General Public, 13 Plaintiff, 14 Case No. CV11-02488 RMW [] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS AND GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT v. Complaint Filed: March 2, 2011 15 16 TREND MICRO CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Defendants. 17 18 ORDER 19 20 On November 15, 2013 this Court conducted a hearing on the Parties’ Joint Motion for Final ______________, 21 Approval of Class Action Settlement and Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and 22 Costs. Having considered the Parties Settlement Agreement, all of the legal authorities and 23 documents submitted in support thereof, and good cause appearing, 24 25 26 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that both motions are GRANTED, subject to the following findings and conclusions: 1. All terms used herein shall have the same meaning as defined in the Parties’ Settlement Agreement. 28 Baker & McKenzie LLP 660 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304 +1 650 856 2400 1 Case No. CV11-02488 RMW [] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS AND GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 1 2. Certification of Settlement Class. Pursuant to Rules 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of 2 Civil Procedure, the Court hereby certifies this Action as a class action on behalf of the following 3 Settlement Class: 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 All persons and entities residing in the United States of America who, after March 2, 2007, extended a Trend Micro software subscription with Trend Micro, at Trend Micro’s online subscription renewal website, prior to the expiration of an existing Trend Micro software subscription, and whose then-existing subscription was cut off and replaced by the new subscription. Included within this class are all such persons and entities who, prior to the expiration of their then current license and through Trend Micro’s online subscription renewal website, either (i) purchased a paid license for a Trend Micro Product to replace a free trial license (that is, “converted”), (ii) renewed their then current license (that is, “renewed”), or (iii) purchased a license for an upgraded Trend Micro Product (that is, “upgraded”). Excluded from the Settlement Class are defendant and its agents and affiliates, government entities, and any customer for whom, at the customer’s request, Trend Micro provided an additional extension that reinstated in full the time remaining on the existing subscription. 3. Jurisdiction. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Action and over all Parties to this Action, including all Class Members. 4. Distribution of the Class Notices and the Claims Forms directed to the Class Members as set forth in the Settlement Agreement and the other matters set forth therein have been completed in conformity with the Court’s Order granting Preliminary Approval, including individual notice to all Class Members who could be identified through reasonable effort, and the best notice practicable under the circumstances. The Notice provided due and adequate notice of the proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, including the proposed Settlement set forth in the Settlement Agreement, to all persons entitled to such Notice, and the Class Notices fully satisfied the requirements of due process. All Class Members and all Released Claims are covered by and included within the Settlement and this Final Order. 5. The Court hereby finds the Settlement was entered into in good faith. The Court further finds that the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and that Plaintiff has satisfied the standards and applicable requirements for final approval of this class action settlement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. 6. The Court hereby approves the Settlement Agreement and finds that it is, in all respects, fair, adequate and reasonable. The Court also directs the Parties to effectuate the 28 Baker & McKenzie LLP 660 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304 +1 650 856 2400 2 Case No. CV11-02488 RMW [] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS AND GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 1 Agreement according to its terms. The Court finds that the Settlement has been reached as a result of 2 intensive, serious and non-collusive, arms’ length negotiations. The Court further finds that the 3 Parties have conducted extensive and costly investigation and research, and counsel for the Parties 4 are able to reasonably evaluate their respective positions. The Court also finds that Settlement at this 5 time will avoid additional substantial costs, as well as avoid the delay and risks that would be 6 presented by the further prosecution of the Action. The Court has reviewed the benefits that are 7 being granted as part of the Settlement and recognizes the significant value to the Class Members. 8 9 7. This Settlement Order and Judgment does not constitute an expression by the Court of any opinion, position or determination as to the merit or lack of merit of any of the claims and/or 10 defenses of the Representative Plaintiff, the Settlement Class, or Trend Micro. Neither this Final 11 Order and Judgment, nor the Settlement Agreement, nor the fact of settlement, nor the settlement 12 proceedings, nor settlement negotiations, nor any related document, shall be used as an admission of 13 any fault or omission by Trend Micro or be offered or received in evidence as an admission, 14 concession, presumption, or inference against Trend Micro for any purpose whatsoever other than in 15 such proceedings as may be necessary to consummate or enforce the Agreement. 16 8. The Court hereby enters a judgment of dismissal of the entire Action, with prejudice, 17 as of the filing date of this Final Order, pursuant to the terms set forth in the Settlement Agreement. 18 Without affecting the finality of this Final Order in any way, the Court hereby retains continuing 19 jurisdiction over the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the Settlement Agreement 20 and all orders entered in connection therewith. 21 9. Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement, and the authorities, evidence and argument 22 submitted by Plaintiff’s Counsel, the Court hereby awards Plaintiff’s Counsel attorneys’ fees and 23 costs in the amount of $___________ and $________, respectively, as final payment for and 24 complete satisfaction of any and all attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by and/or owed to Plaintiff’s 25 Counsel and any other person or entity related to the Action. The Court further orders that 26 Plaintiff/class representative be paid the sum of $1,000.00 as an incentive award. The Court further 27 orders that the award of attorneys’ fees and costs and incentive award set forth in this Paragraph 28 shall be administered pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 3 Baker & McKenzie LLP 660 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304 +1 650 856 2400 Case No. CV11-02488 RMW [] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS AND GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 1 2 10. The Court further orders that the Class shall be notified of this order, its final approval, and the activation of all vouchers via e-mail to the Class and posting on the Settlement website. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Baker & McKenzie LLP 660 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304 +1 650 856 2400 4 Case No. CV11-02488 RMW [] ORDER CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS AND GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?